President Vladimir Putin declared April 25 the National Day of Mourning for the first Russian president, Boris Yeltsin, who died today in Moscow. In his announcement, Putin was most positive on Yeltsin, praising him as a man who gave birth to "a new democratic Russia" and particularly praising the late president for his "massive support" from the people. If public opinion polls before Yeltsin’s death are any guidance, this is one instance where most Russians profoundly disagree with Putin, his great popularity notwithstanding. Yeltsin is widely viewed as a failed leader who pursued policies rejected by the vast majority of Russian citizens—and he pursued them by undemocratic means, including using a tank attack against the duly elected Parliament. He is also remembered as somebody who helped create the class of oligarchs—fantastically rich tycoons who emerged from nowhere primarily through the redistribution of state property, including energy resources, to the benefit of the well-connected few. And all at a time when wages and pensions were rarely paid on time and the living standards of most Russians were dramatically decreasing.
I met Yeltsin late in the 1980s when he was still an aspiring politician and was impressed with his steel will, magnetism and a willingness—in contrast to Mikhail Gorbachev—to make tough decisions and to do whatever it took to accomplish his objectives. These were the qualifications of a perfect revolutionary. But Yeltsin was no democrat. If anything, he was less devoted to democratic values than Gorbachev. My impression was that he had no real political philosophy whatsoever, just a great sense of entitlement to take over Russia. He would use this power as a building block to create a new multinational entity on the Soviet territory where most of the republics, after rejecting Soviet rule, somehow were expected to endorse Russia’s and, of course, Yeltsin’s personal predominance. That clearly was an illusion.
As with Russian czars, Yeltsin had little respect for people, including his closest associates, as long as their station in life was below his. He enjoyed dealing with Presidents George H. W. Bush and Bill Clinton, thinking that he was their equal, even as they—Clinton especially—were taking advantage of his ignorance, vanity and alcohol abuse to get concessions from Moscow.
It was Yeltsin who began relying on the post-KGB security services as a major instrument of running the country long before Putin came to power. Yeltsin’s respect for democratic procedure can be well-illustrated by his conversation with Richard Nixon back in April 1993 when, after meeting with Yeltsin’s opponents, Speaker of the Supreme Soviet Ruslan Khasbulatov and then–Vice President Alexander Rutskoy, Nixon shared with the Russian president that these people were professing a willingness to support pro-market reforms, as long as they would be given more voice in formulating them and there would be greater emphasis on social protection of the weak. "You really mean, Mr. President, that I should listen to these midgets?" Yeltsin asked. Earlier in 1992, Yeltsin reacted in disbelief when I told him in Nixon’s presence that there was a good possibility of Bill Clinton prevailing over George H. W. Bush for the presidency. "But I thought that Bush was popular with the U.S. ruling class. Do you really mean to say that in America it is the common rabble who determines the next president of the United States?"
Anecdotes, of course, are always selective and history will remember Yeltsin defiantly standing on the tank, heroically leading the opposition to a reactionary coup d’état in 1991. If only he had ended his career then after bringing a triumph to the anti-Communist revolution.
Posted by Dimitri Simes at 04/23/2007 05:55:16 PM |
<i>If only he had ended his career then after bringing a triumph to the anti-Communist revolution.</i>
There would be no Russia, then. Instead, there would be Muscovy, the fiefdom of Tatarstan, and Caliphate of the North Caucasus. The economy would still be based on the barter system, and people would wait in 3-hour lines to purchase a loaf of bread and a stick of "kolbasa" for R3.50. In fact, Russia would probably have a third less population by this time. At the beginning of 1992, the treasury was empty, while there was enough grain to sustain the larger cities for about two weeks. Posted by: Igor ( email ) on 04/25/2007 11:15 AM
|