Blogs: The Skeptics

It Is Now Trump’s Job to Protect U.S. Elections

The Skeptics

The blockbuster Washington Post story detailing the Obama administration’s reaction to Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election continues to make news. There is now clear and convincing evidence of a concerted Russian effort to influence the 2016 presidential election. The story concentrates on President Obama’s actions. We should also ponder what President Trump would have done differently.

Much of the chatter has focused on an unnamed senior Obama administration official who said of the White House’s response, “It is the hardest thing about my entire time in government to defend.”

“I feel like we sort of choked.”

The story and the reaction to it poses a unique challenge to President Trump. At times, he has adopted a cavalier approach to the question of Russian interference. In one bizarre instance in late July, he appeared to call on the Russians to release Hillary Clinton’s missing emails.

The Trump campaign quickly clarified the candidate’s remarks, and for the most part Donald Trump has simply denied the allegations. As recently as last Thursday, the day before the Post story dropped, the president dismissed the U.S. intelligence agencies’ claims of Russian interference as a “big Dem HOAX” and “a big Dem scam and excuse for losing the election!”

The Washington Post story should put such claims to rest.

It is also now clear, in retrospect, that the Obama administration did make some serious errors. The supposition that Russia had escalation dominance in this instance was particularly wrongheaded. Although the Russians are weak, they do have an advantage over the United States in matters and places of vital interest to them (in the countries along Russia’s border, for example). But the sanctity of the U.S. electoral process is a vital U.S. interest.

I don't think, however, that this mistaken belief that the Russians could and would do more harm to us than we could do to them is the most important part of the story.

The passage below stuck out to me:

[Obama administration officials] worried that any action they took would be perceived as political interference in an already volatile campaign. By August, Trump was predicting that the election would be rigged. Obama officials feared providing fuel to such claims, playing into Russia's efforts to discredit the outcome and potentially contaminating the expected Clinton triumph.

In other words, they weren’t mostly worried about the Russian reaction, but rather the American one.

That is also Donald Trump’s interpretation:

“The reason that President Obama did NOTHING about Russia after being notified by the CIA of meddling is that he expected Clinton would win,” he tweeted on Monday.

Obama, Trump continued, “did not want to ‘rock the boat.’ He didn't ‘choke,’ he colluded or obstructed, and it did the Dems and Crooked Hillary no good.”

You can fault Obama et al for being overconfident of a Clinton victory. But it seems more than plausible that Trump supporters would have interpreted the public revelation of Russian hacking in August or September as further evidence that the election was rigged against Trump—especially if the revelations came from the Obama administration, or anyone deemed to be a Clinton partisan, for that matter.

Pages

If Russia Wants the Syria Mess, Let Them Have It

The Skeptics

The blockbuster Washington Post story detailing the Obama administration’s reaction to Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election continues to make news. There is now clear and convincing evidence of a concerted Russian effort to influence the 2016 presidential election. The story concentrates on President Obama’s actions. We should also ponder what President Trump would have done differently.

Much of the chatter has focused on an unnamed senior Obama administration official who said of the White House’s response, “It is the hardest thing about my entire time in government to defend.”

“I feel like we sort of choked.”

The story and the reaction to it poses a unique challenge to President Trump. At times, he has adopted a cavalier approach to the question of Russian interference. In one bizarre instance in late July, he appeared to call on the Russians to release Hillary Clinton’s missing emails.

The Trump campaign quickly clarified the candidate’s remarks, and for the most part Donald Trump has simply denied the allegations. As recently as last Thursday, the day before the Post story dropped, the president dismissed the U.S. intelligence agencies’ claims of Russian interference as a “big Dem HOAX” and “a big Dem scam and excuse for losing the election!”

The Washington Post story should put such claims to rest.

It is also now clear, in retrospect, that the Obama administration did make some serious errors. The supposition that Russia had escalation dominance in this instance was particularly wrongheaded. Although the Russians are weak, they do have an advantage over the United States in matters and places of vital interest to them (in the countries along Russia’s border, for example). But the sanctity of the U.S. electoral process is a vital U.S. interest.

I don't think, however, that this mistaken belief that the Russians could and would do more harm to us than we could do to them is the most important part of the story.

The passage below stuck out to me:

[Obama administration officials] worried that any action they took would be perceived as political interference in an already volatile campaign. By August, Trump was predicting that the election would be rigged. Obama officials feared providing fuel to such claims, playing into Russia's efforts to discredit the outcome and potentially contaminating the expected Clinton triumph.

In other words, they weren’t mostly worried about the Russian reaction, but rather the American one.

That is also Donald Trump’s interpretation:

“The reason that President Obama did NOTHING about Russia after being notified by the CIA of meddling is that he expected Clinton would win,” he tweeted on Monday.

Obama, Trump continued, “did not want to ‘rock the boat.’ He didn't ‘choke,’ he colluded or obstructed, and it did the Dems and Crooked Hillary no good.”

You can fault Obama et al for being overconfident of a Clinton victory. But it seems more than plausible that Trump supporters would have interpreted the public revelation of Russian hacking in August or September as further evidence that the election was rigged against Trump—especially if the revelations came from the Obama administration, or anyone deemed to be a Clinton partisan, for that matter.

Pages

I Was in Pyongyang When Otto Warmbier Was Released

The Skeptics

The blockbuster Washington Post story detailing the Obama administration’s reaction to Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election continues to make news. There is now clear and convincing evidence of a concerted Russian effort to influence the 2016 presidential election. The story concentrates on President Obama’s actions. We should also ponder what President Trump would have done differently.

Much of the chatter has focused on an unnamed senior Obama administration official who said of the White House’s response, “It is the hardest thing about my entire time in government to defend.”

“I feel like we sort of choked.”

The story and the reaction to it poses a unique challenge to President Trump. At times, he has adopted a cavalier approach to the question of Russian interference. In one bizarre instance in late July, he appeared to call on the Russians to release Hillary Clinton’s missing emails.

The Trump campaign quickly clarified the candidate’s remarks, and for the most part Donald Trump has simply denied the allegations. As recently as last Thursday, the day before the Post story dropped, the president dismissed the U.S. intelligence agencies’ claims of Russian interference as a “big Dem HOAX” and “a big Dem scam and excuse for losing the election!”

The Washington Post story should put such claims to rest.

It is also now clear, in retrospect, that the Obama administration did make some serious errors. The supposition that Russia had escalation dominance in this instance was particularly wrongheaded. Although the Russians are weak, they do have an advantage over the United States in matters and places of vital interest to them (in the countries along Russia’s border, for example). But the sanctity of the U.S. electoral process is a vital U.S. interest.

I don't think, however, that this mistaken belief that the Russians could and would do more harm to us than we could do to them is the most important part of the story.

The passage below stuck out to me:

[Obama administration officials] worried that any action they took would be perceived as political interference in an already volatile campaign. By August, Trump was predicting that the election would be rigged. Obama officials feared providing fuel to such claims, playing into Russia's efforts to discredit the outcome and potentially contaminating the expected Clinton triumph.

In other words, they weren’t mostly worried about the Russian reaction, but rather the American one.

That is also Donald Trump’s interpretation:

“The reason that President Obama did NOTHING about Russia after being notified by the CIA of meddling is that he expected Clinton would win,” he tweeted on Monday.

Obama, Trump continued, “did not want to ‘rock the boat.’ He didn't ‘choke,’ he colluded or obstructed, and it did the Dems and Crooked Hillary no good.”

You can fault Obama et al for being overconfident of a Clinton victory. But it seems more than plausible that Trump supporters would have interpreted the public revelation of Russian hacking in August or September as further evidence that the election was rigged against Trump—especially if the revelations came from the Obama administration, or anyone deemed to be a Clinton partisan, for that matter.

Pages

America Is Getting Sucked into Another Middle East Quagmire

The Skeptics

The blockbuster Washington Post story detailing the Obama administration’s reaction to Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election continues to make news. There is now clear and convincing evidence of a concerted Russian effort to influence the 2016 presidential election. The story concentrates on President Obama’s actions. We should also ponder what President Trump would have done differently.

Much of the chatter has focused on an unnamed senior Obama administration official who said of the White House’s response, “It is the hardest thing about my entire time in government to defend.”

“I feel like we sort of choked.”

The story and the reaction to it poses a unique challenge to President Trump. At times, he has adopted a cavalier approach to the question of Russian interference. In one bizarre instance in late July, he appeared to call on the Russians to release Hillary Clinton’s missing emails.

The Trump campaign quickly clarified the candidate’s remarks, and for the most part Donald Trump has simply denied the allegations. As recently as last Thursday, the day before the Post story dropped, the president dismissed the U.S. intelligence agencies’ claims of Russian interference as a “big Dem HOAX” and “a big Dem scam and excuse for losing the election!”

The Washington Post story should put such claims to rest.

It is also now clear, in retrospect, that the Obama administration did make some serious errors. The supposition that Russia had escalation dominance in this instance was particularly wrongheaded. Although the Russians are weak, they do have an advantage over the United States in matters and places of vital interest to them (in the countries along Russia’s border, for example). But the sanctity of the U.S. electoral process is a vital U.S. interest.

I don't think, however, that this mistaken belief that the Russians could and would do more harm to us than we could do to them is the most important part of the story.

The passage below stuck out to me:

[Obama administration officials] worried that any action they took would be perceived as political interference in an already volatile campaign. By August, Trump was predicting that the election would be rigged. Obama officials feared providing fuel to such claims, playing into Russia's efforts to discredit the outcome and potentially contaminating the expected Clinton triumph.

In other words, they weren’t mostly worried about the Russian reaction, but rather the American one.

That is also Donald Trump’s interpretation:

“The reason that President Obama did NOTHING about Russia after being notified by the CIA of meddling is that he expected Clinton would win,” he tweeted on Monday.

Obama, Trump continued, “did not want to ‘rock the boat.’ He didn't ‘choke,’ he colluded or obstructed, and it did the Dems and Crooked Hillary no good.”

You can fault Obama et al for being overconfident of a Clinton victory. But it seems more than plausible that Trump supporters would have interpreted the public revelation of Russian hacking in August or September as further evidence that the election was rigged against Trump—especially if the revelations came from the Obama administration, or anyone deemed to be a Clinton partisan, for that matter.

Pages

Congress Needs to Take War Powers Back into Its Own Hands

The Skeptics

The blockbuster Washington Post story detailing the Obama administration’s reaction to Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election continues to make news. There is now clear and convincing evidence of a concerted Russian effort to influence the 2016 presidential election. The story concentrates on President Obama’s actions. We should also ponder what President Trump would have done differently.

Much of the chatter has focused on an unnamed senior Obama administration official who said of the White House’s response, “It is the hardest thing about my entire time in government to defend.”

“I feel like we sort of choked.”

The story and the reaction to it poses a unique challenge to President Trump. At times, he has adopted a cavalier approach to the question of Russian interference. In one bizarre instance in late July, he appeared to call on the Russians to release Hillary Clinton’s missing emails.

The Trump campaign quickly clarified the candidate’s remarks, and for the most part Donald Trump has simply denied the allegations. As recently as last Thursday, the day before the Post story dropped, the president dismissed the U.S. intelligence agencies’ claims of Russian interference as a “big Dem HOAX” and “a big Dem scam and excuse for losing the election!”

The Washington Post story should put such claims to rest.

It is also now clear, in retrospect, that the Obama administration did make some serious errors. The supposition that Russia had escalation dominance in this instance was particularly wrongheaded. Although the Russians are weak, they do have an advantage over the United States in matters and places of vital interest to them (in the countries along Russia’s border, for example). But the sanctity of the U.S. electoral process is a vital U.S. interest.

I don't think, however, that this mistaken belief that the Russians could and would do more harm to us than we could do to them is the most important part of the story.

The passage below stuck out to me:

[Obama administration officials] worried that any action they took would be perceived as political interference in an already volatile campaign. By August, Trump was predicting that the election would be rigged. Obama officials feared providing fuel to such claims, playing into Russia's efforts to discredit the outcome and potentially contaminating the expected Clinton triumph.

In other words, they weren’t mostly worried about the Russian reaction, but rather the American one.

That is also Donald Trump’s interpretation:

“The reason that President Obama did NOTHING about Russia after being notified by the CIA of meddling is that he expected Clinton would win,” he tweeted on Monday.

Obama, Trump continued, “did not want to ‘rock the boat.’ He didn't ‘choke,’ he colluded or obstructed, and it did the Dems and Crooked Hillary no good.”

You can fault Obama et al for being overconfident of a Clinton victory. But it seems more than plausible that Trump supporters would have interpreted the public revelation of Russian hacking in August or September as further evidence that the election was rigged against Trump—especially if the revelations came from the Obama administration, or anyone deemed to be a Clinton partisan, for that matter.

Pages

Pages