Blogs: The Skeptics

Why U.S. Sanctions Are Unlikely to Deter North Korea

The Skeptics

This past weekend, there was good news on the North Korea front. Yes, you heard that right; for a change, we aren’t talking about an underground nuclear test or another intercontinental ballistic missile launch screeching into the waters near Japan, but rather a unified message from the international community that Pyongyang’s antics are making it more enemies by the week.

After a month of negotiations between Washington and Beijing, the UN Security Council passed another resolution against North Korea that U.S. Ambassador Nikki Haley described bombastically as “the most stringent set of sanctions on any country in a generation.” Whether that is an accurate assessment, the Security Council’s most recent sanctions measure against Kim Jong-un, coming a week after he authorized two ICBM tests in three weeks, has the potential to cause a lot of damage to Pyongyang’s pocketbook—if the resolution is implemented stringently. North Korea’s meager exports (pegged at about $3 billion per year) could decrease by a third, a $1 billion decline in export revenue, which means Kim will have $1 billion less to throw at his nuclear and missile programs. Countries will no longer be permitted to import North Korean seafood, iron, iron-ore and coal. Nor will they be allowed to aid in the shipment of those goods if they traveled through North Korean territory on route to their ultimate destination. Equally significant, nations accepting North Korean laborers will be prohibited from accepting more of them onto their territory.

With punishments like these, why wouldn’t the Trump administration celebrate? Even President Trump was pleased about the outcome, tweeting that the “United Nations Resolution is the single largest economic sanctions package ever on North Korea. Over one billion dollars in cost to N.K.”

Politically, the Security Council resolution was a big win for a White House with very little to brag about after its first six months. But in the final analysis, the eighth round of sanctions in response to Pyongyang’s weapons of mass destruction programs will probably be forgotten in a few weeks. The United States—under three presidents and over a span of eleven years—has attempted to starve the North Koreans into abolishing their nuclear and missile capability, as if just piling on more economic restrictions will finally and irrevocably push Kim into disarmament. And yet time and again, Kim has resisted doing so; launches have continued, new missile models have been developed, nukes have been detonated, and Kim hasn’t neglected to remind anybody willing to listen that his glorious nation won’t think twice about raining nuclear hellfire on Washington, Seoul and Tokyo if his regime’s survival is at stake. To believe that last weekend’s measure in the Security Council will be the magic formula and buckle the knees of the North Koreans when seven prior sanctions packages have fallen short is like lending money to a penny-pitching cousin and expecting him to pay you back on time, with interest. It’s nice to imagine it, but reality will eventually slap you out of your daydream.

It’s a well-worn tradition in Washington policy circles to state that a quarter-century of U.S.-North Korea policy has been ineffective. But in this instance, the tradition is right; on North Korea, the United States has pulled out pretty much every tactic from the playbook.

Diplomacy was attempted and partially successful in the Clinton administration, but by George W. Bush's second year on the job, U.S. intelligence officials concluded that Pyongyang was secretly working on a uranium enrichment facility. A combination of carrots and sticks was implemented during the latter years of Bush’s tenure, but the North Koreans were so stingy on accepting strong and independent IAEA inspection protocols that time ran out before Bush could hammer out a deal. The strategic-patience policy of the Obama years was foreign-policy bureaucratese for piling up the economic pressure and waiting for Kim Jong-un to come to the table. The Trump administration, following in the footsteps of its predecessors, is essentially leaning on China to resolve the North Korean nuclear problem for the United States, forgetting—or maybe ignoring—that Beijing’s interests on the Korean Peninsula or not identical to America’s.

Pages

Trump Must Tread Carefully with Preventative War in North Korea

The Skeptics

This past weekend, there was good news on the North Korea front. Yes, you heard that right; for a change, we aren’t talking about an underground nuclear test or another intercontinental ballistic missile launch screeching into the waters near Japan, but rather a unified message from the international community that Pyongyang’s antics are making it more enemies by the week.

After a month of negotiations between Washington and Beijing, the UN Security Council passed another resolution against North Korea that U.S. Ambassador Nikki Haley described bombastically as “the most stringent set of sanctions on any country in a generation.” Whether that is an accurate assessment, the Security Council’s most recent sanctions measure against Kim Jong-un, coming a week after he authorized two ICBM tests in three weeks, has the potential to cause a lot of damage to Pyongyang’s pocketbook—if the resolution is implemented stringently. North Korea’s meager exports (pegged at about $3 billion per year) could decrease by a third, a $1 billion decline in export revenue, which means Kim will have $1 billion less to throw at his nuclear and missile programs. Countries will no longer be permitted to import North Korean seafood, iron, iron-ore and coal. Nor will they be allowed to aid in the shipment of those goods if they traveled through North Korean territory on route to their ultimate destination. Equally significant, nations accepting North Korean laborers will be prohibited from accepting more of them onto their territory.

With punishments like these, why wouldn’t the Trump administration celebrate? Even President Trump was pleased about the outcome, tweeting that the “United Nations Resolution is the single largest economic sanctions package ever on North Korea. Over one billion dollars in cost to N.K.”

Politically, the Security Council resolution was a big win for a White House with very little to brag about after its first six months. But in the final analysis, the eighth round of sanctions in response to Pyongyang’s weapons of mass destruction programs will probably be forgotten in a few weeks. The United States—under three presidents and over a span of eleven years—has attempted to starve the North Koreans into abolishing their nuclear and missile capability, as if just piling on more economic restrictions will finally and irrevocably push Kim into disarmament. And yet time and again, Kim has resisted doing so; launches have continued, new missile models have been developed, nukes have been detonated, and Kim hasn’t neglected to remind anybody willing to listen that his glorious nation won’t think twice about raining nuclear hellfire on Washington, Seoul and Tokyo if his regime’s survival is at stake. To believe that last weekend’s measure in the Security Council will be the magic formula and buckle the knees of the North Koreans when seven prior sanctions packages have fallen short is like lending money to a penny-pitching cousin and expecting him to pay you back on time, with interest. It’s nice to imagine it, but reality will eventually slap you out of your daydream.

It’s a well-worn tradition in Washington policy circles to state that a quarter-century of U.S.-North Korea policy has been ineffective. But in this instance, the tradition is right; on North Korea, the United States has pulled out pretty much every tactic from the playbook.

Diplomacy was attempted and partially successful in the Clinton administration, but by George W. Bush's second year on the job, U.S. intelligence officials concluded that Pyongyang was secretly working on a uranium enrichment facility. A combination of carrots and sticks was implemented during the latter years of Bush’s tenure, but the North Koreans were so stingy on accepting strong and independent IAEA inspection protocols that time ran out before Bush could hammer out a deal. The strategic-patience policy of the Obama years was foreign-policy bureaucratese for piling up the economic pressure and waiting for Kim Jong-un to come to the table. The Trump administration, following in the footsteps of its predecessors, is essentially leaning on China to resolve the North Korean nuclear problem for the United States, forgetting—or maybe ignoring—that Beijing’s interests on the Korean Peninsula or not identical to America’s.

Pages

Trump's Crisis of Authority

The Skeptics

This past weekend, there was good news on the North Korea front. Yes, you heard that right; for a change, we aren’t talking about an underground nuclear test or another intercontinental ballistic missile launch screeching into the waters near Japan, but rather a unified message from the international community that Pyongyang’s antics are making it more enemies by the week.

After a month of negotiations between Washington and Beijing, the UN Security Council passed another resolution against North Korea that U.S. Ambassador Nikki Haley described bombastically as “the most stringent set of sanctions on any country in a generation.” Whether that is an accurate assessment, the Security Council’s most recent sanctions measure against Kim Jong-un, coming a week after he authorized two ICBM tests in three weeks, has the potential to cause a lot of damage to Pyongyang’s pocketbook—if the resolution is implemented stringently. North Korea’s meager exports (pegged at about $3 billion per year) could decrease by a third, a $1 billion decline in export revenue, which means Kim will have $1 billion less to throw at his nuclear and missile programs. Countries will no longer be permitted to import North Korean seafood, iron, iron-ore and coal. Nor will they be allowed to aid in the shipment of those goods if they traveled through North Korean territory on route to their ultimate destination. Equally significant, nations accepting North Korean laborers will be prohibited from accepting more of them onto their territory.

With punishments like these, why wouldn’t the Trump administration celebrate? Even President Trump was pleased about the outcome, tweeting that the “United Nations Resolution is the single largest economic sanctions package ever on North Korea. Over one billion dollars in cost to N.K.”

Politically, the Security Council resolution was a big win for a White House with very little to brag about after its first six months. But in the final analysis, the eighth round of sanctions in response to Pyongyang’s weapons of mass destruction programs will probably be forgotten in a few weeks. The United States—under three presidents and over a span of eleven years—has attempted to starve the North Koreans into abolishing their nuclear and missile capability, as if just piling on more economic restrictions will finally and irrevocably push Kim into disarmament. And yet time and again, Kim has resisted doing so; launches have continued, new missile models have been developed, nukes have been detonated, and Kim hasn’t neglected to remind anybody willing to listen that his glorious nation won’t think twice about raining nuclear hellfire on Washington, Seoul and Tokyo if his regime’s survival is at stake. To believe that last weekend’s measure in the Security Council will be the magic formula and buckle the knees of the North Koreans when seven prior sanctions packages have fallen short is like lending money to a penny-pitching cousin and expecting him to pay you back on time, with interest. It’s nice to imagine it, but reality will eventually slap you out of your daydream.

It’s a well-worn tradition in Washington policy circles to state that a quarter-century of U.S.-North Korea policy has been ineffective. But in this instance, the tradition is right; on North Korea, the United States has pulled out pretty much every tactic from the playbook.

Diplomacy was attempted and partially successful in the Clinton administration, but by George W. Bush's second year on the job, U.S. intelligence officials concluded that Pyongyang was secretly working on a uranium enrichment facility. A combination of carrots and sticks was implemented during the latter years of Bush’s tenure, but the North Koreans were so stingy on accepting strong and independent IAEA inspection protocols that time ran out before Bush could hammer out a deal. The strategic-patience policy of the Obama years was foreign-policy bureaucratese for piling up the economic pressure and waiting for Kim Jong-un to come to the table. The Trump administration, following in the footsteps of its predecessors, is essentially leaning on China to resolve the North Korean nuclear problem for the United States, forgetting—or maybe ignoring—that Beijing’s interests on the Korean Peninsula or not identical to America’s.

Pages

North Korea Does Not Trust America for a Pretty Good Reason

The Skeptics

This past weekend, there was good news on the North Korea front. Yes, you heard that right; for a change, we aren’t talking about an underground nuclear test or another intercontinental ballistic missile launch screeching into the waters near Japan, but rather a unified message from the international community that Pyongyang’s antics are making it more enemies by the week.

After a month of negotiations between Washington and Beijing, the UN Security Council passed another resolution against North Korea that U.S. Ambassador Nikki Haley described bombastically as “the most stringent set of sanctions on any country in a generation.” Whether that is an accurate assessment, the Security Council’s most recent sanctions measure against Kim Jong-un, coming a week after he authorized two ICBM tests in three weeks, has the potential to cause a lot of damage to Pyongyang’s pocketbook—if the resolution is implemented stringently. North Korea’s meager exports (pegged at about $3 billion per year) could decrease by a third, a $1 billion decline in export revenue, which means Kim will have $1 billion less to throw at his nuclear and missile programs. Countries will no longer be permitted to import North Korean seafood, iron, iron-ore and coal. Nor will they be allowed to aid in the shipment of those goods if they traveled through North Korean territory on route to their ultimate destination. Equally significant, nations accepting North Korean laborers will be prohibited from accepting more of them onto their territory.

With punishments like these, why wouldn’t the Trump administration celebrate? Even President Trump was pleased about the outcome, tweeting that the “United Nations Resolution is the single largest economic sanctions package ever on North Korea. Over one billion dollars in cost to N.K.”

Politically, the Security Council resolution was a big win for a White House with very little to brag about after its first six months. But in the final analysis, the eighth round of sanctions in response to Pyongyang’s weapons of mass destruction programs will probably be forgotten in a few weeks. The United States—under three presidents and over a span of eleven years—has attempted to starve the North Koreans into abolishing their nuclear and missile capability, as if just piling on more economic restrictions will finally and irrevocably push Kim into disarmament. And yet time and again, Kim has resisted doing so; launches have continued, new missile models have been developed, nukes have been detonated, and Kim hasn’t neglected to remind anybody willing to listen that his glorious nation won’t think twice about raining nuclear hellfire on Washington, Seoul and Tokyo if his regime’s survival is at stake. To believe that last weekend’s measure in the Security Council will be the magic formula and buckle the knees of the North Koreans when seven prior sanctions packages have fallen short is like lending money to a penny-pitching cousin and expecting him to pay you back on time, with interest. It’s nice to imagine it, but reality will eventually slap you out of your daydream.

It’s a well-worn tradition in Washington policy circles to state that a quarter-century of U.S.-North Korea policy has been ineffective. But in this instance, the tradition is right; on North Korea, the United States has pulled out pretty much every tactic from the playbook.

Diplomacy was attempted and partially successful in the Clinton administration, but by George W. Bush's second year on the job, U.S. intelligence officials concluded that Pyongyang was secretly working on a uranium enrichment facility. A combination of carrots and sticks was implemented during the latter years of Bush’s tenure, but the North Koreans were so stingy on accepting strong and independent IAEA inspection protocols that time ran out before Bush could hammer out a deal. The strategic-patience policy of the Obama years was foreign-policy bureaucratese for piling up the economic pressure and waiting for Kim Jong-un to come to the table. The Trump administration, following in the footsteps of its predecessors, is essentially leaning on China to resolve the North Korean nuclear problem for the United States, forgetting—or maybe ignoring—that Beijing’s interests on the Korean Peninsula or not identical to America’s.

Pages

Is America Standing On the Precipice of Another War?

The Skeptics

This past weekend, there was good news on the North Korea front. Yes, you heard that right; for a change, we aren’t talking about an underground nuclear test or another intercontinental ballistic missile launch screeching into the waters near Japan, but rather a unified message from the international community that Pyongyang’s antics are making it more enemies by the week.

After a month of negotiations between Washington and Beijing, the UN Security Council passed another resolution against North Korea that U.S. Ambassador Nikki Haley described bombastically as “the most stringent set of sanctions on any country in a generation.” Whether that is an accurate assessment, the Security Council’s most recent sanctions measure against Kim Jong-un, coming a week after he authorized two ICBM tests in three weeks, has the potential to cause a lot of damage to Pyongyang’s pocketbook—if the resolution is implemented stringently. North Korea’s meager exports (pegged at about $3 billion per year) could decrease by a third, a $1 billion decline in export revenue, which means Kim will have $1 billion less to throw at his nuclear and missile programs. Countries will no longer be permitted to import North Korean seafood, iron, iron-ore and coal. Nor will they be allowed to aid in the shipment of those goods if they traveled through North Korean territory on route to their ultimate destination. Equally significant, nations accepting North Korean laborers will be prohibited from accepting more of them onto their territory.

With punishments like these, why wouldn’t the Trump administration celebrate? Even President Trump was pleased about the outcome, tweeting that the “United Nations Resolution is the single largest economic sanctions package ever on North Korea. Over one billion dollars in cost to N.K.”

Politically, the Security Council resolution was a big win for a White House with very little to brag about after its first six months. But in the final analysis, the eighth round of sanctions in response to Pyongyang’s weapons of mass destruction programs will probably be forgotten in a few weeks. The United States—under three presidents and over a span of eleven years—has attempted to starve the North Koreans into abolishing their nuclear and missile capability, as if just piling on more economic restrictions will finally and irrevocably push Kim into disarmament. And yet time and again, Kim has resisted doing so; launches have continued, new missile models have been developed, nukes have been detonated, and Kim hasn’t neglected to remind anybody willing to listen that his glorious nation won’t think twice about raining nuclear hellfire on Washington, Seoul and Tokyo if his regime’s survival is at stake. To believe that last weekend’s measure in the Security Council will be the magic formula and buckle the knees of the North Koreans when seven prior sanctions packages have fallen short is like lending money to a penny-pitching cousin and expecting him to pay you back on time, with interest. It’s nice to imagine it, but reality will eventually slap you out of your daydream.

It’s a well-worn tradition in Washington policy circles to state that a quarter-century of U.S.-North Korea policy has been ineffective. But in this instance, the tradition is right; on North Korea, the United States has pulled out pretty much every tactic from the playbook.

Diplomacy was attempted and partially successful in the Clinton administration, but by George W. Bush's second year on the job, U.S. intelligence officials concluded that Pyongyang was secretly working on a uranium enrichment facility. A combination of carrots and sticks was implemented during the latter years of Bush’s tenure, but the North Koreans were so stingy on accepting strong and independent IAEA inspection protocols that time ran out before Bush could hammer out a deal. The strategic-patience policy of the Obama years was foreign-policy bureaucratese for piling up the economic pressure and waiting for Kim Jong-un to come to the table. The Trump administration, following in the footsteps of its predecessors, is essentially leaning on China to resolve the North Korean nuclear problem for the United States, forgetting—or maybe ignoring—that Beijing’s interests on the Korean Peninsula or not identical to America’s.

Pages

Pages