There have been numerous media accounts about the use of Predator drones in Afghanistan and Pakistan—and occasionally in such places as Yemen. But we now find that those deadly unmanned aerial vehicles have also been present in the skies over Mexico for the past two years. It is bad enough that the American people were unaware of that fact, but much worse is that the Mexican people and the Mexican Congress were not told. Washington’s insensitive strategy could easily create a surge of ill-will toward the United States south of the border.
Taking such a risk suggests just how worried the Obama administration is that the Mexican government is losing its war against the drug cartels. Such worries may be causing the United States to pressure the government of President Felipe Calderon to accept more direct U.S. involvement in that conflict. Some of the measures are so intrusive that they create considerable controversy inside Mexico and even raise questions about Washington’s respect for Mexico’s sovereignty.
When the story broke earlier this month that the Predator drones were flying over Mexican territory in an effort to locate suspected drug traffickers and track their movements, the reaction in Mexico was swift and largely unfavorable. What upset critics in Mexico’s legislature and much of the news media was that those drones had been operating without anyone outside the Calderon administration being informed. Senator Ricardo Monreal, one of the more left-wing members of the legislature, blasted administration officials as being “timid, weak, servile, and subordinate” in dealing with Washington.
Foreign Relations Secretary Patricia Espinosa rushed to quiet the brewing storm, insisting in a hastily called meeting with senators that Mexico’s sovereignty had not been compromised. The drone flights, she said, “do not violate [our] sovereignty because they are controlled by the government of Mexico and contribute to its capacity to fight organized crime.”
There wasn’t much evidence of Mexican government control or even influence regarding the use of the drones, however. It appeared to be a totally U.S.-directed operation. Furthermore, the Predators seemed to be merely one component of a rapidly increasing U.S. presence in Mexico to wage the drug war. Brad Barker, president of HALO Corporation, a private security firm that was involved in the drone program, may have inadvertently revealed just how extensive Washington’s involvement has become. Noting that his firm and others were tracking both vehicles and people in drug-infested areas of Mexico, Barker stated: “There’s been a huge spike in agents down there.”
Both the U.S. and Mexican governments refuse to divulge just how many U.S. agents are in Mexico to conduct anti-drug activities. But using the Freedom of Information Act, government audits, congressional testimony, and other indicators, the Associated Press was able to determine that were at least “several hundred” operating in that country. And most of that information had been gathered before the February murder of Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent Jaime Zapata in northern Mexico, an incident that led to a new surge of U.S. personnel south of the border.
Washington is pursuing a risky strategy, given the renowned nationalist sensitivities of the Mexican public about the “Colossus of the North”—sensitivities that date all the way back to the Mexican War in the 1840s. Political opponents and much of the Mexican public already regard Calderon as a U.S. stooge, and the new revelations about the extent of U.S. security activities in their country are not going to help his reputation.
One just hopes that Washington does not escalate matters by having the deadly Predators launch missiles to take out a reputed drug lord—as has been done routinely regarding suspected terrorists in parts of the Muslim world. The extent of the uproar that such an incident would cause in Mexico, even if there were no collateral casualties among innocent civilians, can scarcely be imagined.






Comments
Love the title of the article.The Mexican public does not respect the soveriegnity of the United States, so this just might make us a bit more even. They would like us to accept at least 10% of their population as our citizens while they also retain them as theirs and send even more every day.We want them to let us assist in stopping drug and human trafficking on the border. They refuse for the most part and our agents who are in their nation are not allowed to be armed. Our drones are used for observation and have not fired on any "targets".What the Mexican government wants is free access Northbound for all comers. Southbound they want to demand we stop the flow of guns. Both nations have laws they would like respected. Fair enough. But it would be asking too much to just have us stop the Southbound traffic and ignore the Northbound.The alternative to achive the goal would be to completely militarize the border. That is something neither country wants. Mexico has had a problem with America having captured the Southwest (and then having paid for it) for 160 years and some there claim it is simply "occupied Mexican territory". That was settled long ago.They are a major trading partner of the US and the crimes of illegal immigration, and drug and human smuggling hurt both nations. Monitoring by drones seems to be a reasonable way to try to provide information to suppress the crime. That more of their citizens get caught sneaking into the US without permission and sent back is a price they should at least be willing to pay if they want help to quell the revolution happening there in the guise of a "drug war".