Rioting in Tunisia and Egypt in early 2011 unleashed a tidal wave of unrest across the Arab world that was soon designated the "Arab Spring.” Enthusiasts in the West hailed a new birth of freedom for a giant slice of humanity that has been living in despotic darkness for centuries. But historians in fifty or a hundred years may well point to the 1979 events in Teheran—the Islamist revolution that toppled the Shah—as the real trigger of this so-called "spring" (which is looking more and more like a deep, forbidding winter). And the Islamist Hamas victory in the Palestinian general elections of 2006 and that organization's armed takeover of the Gaza Strip the following year probably signified further milestones on the same path.
For, if nothing else, the past weeks' developments have driven home one message: That the main result of the "Arab Spring" will be—at least in the short and medium terms, and, I fear, in the long-term as well—an accelerated Islamization of the Arab world. In the Mashreq—the eastern Arab lands, including Saudi Arabia, Syria and Iraq—the jury may still be out (though recent events in Palestine and Jordan are not encouraging). But in the Maghreb—the western Arab lands, from Egypt to the Atlantic coast—the direction of development is crystal clear.
In Tunisia the Islamist al-Nahda (Ennahda) Party won a clear victory in the country's first free elections, winning some 90 out of 217 seats in the special assembly which in the coming months is to chart the country's political future. Speculation about whether the party is genuinely "moderate" Islamist—as its leader, Rachid Ghannouchi, insists—or fundamentally intent on imposing sharia religious law over Tunisia through a process of creeping Islamisation a la the Gaza Strip and Turkey is immaterial. The Islamists won, hands down and against all initial expectations—and in a country that was thought to be the most secular and "Western" in the Arab world. Freedom of thought and religious freedom are not exactly foundations of Islamist thinking, and whether Tunisian "democracy" will survive this election is anyone's guess.
To the east, in the tribal wreckage that is Libya, the Islamist factions appear to be the major force emerging from the demise of the Qaddafi regime. In the coming weeks and months we are likely to see movement toward elections that will hammer down another Islamist victory.
And much the same appears to be emerging from the far more significant upheaval in Libya's eastern neighbor, Egypt, with its 90 million inhabitants—the deomographic, cultural and political center of the Arab world and its weather vane. The recent crackdown, by a Muslim mob and then the ruling military, against Coptic Christian demonstrators (protesting the destruction of a church) was only, I fear, a taste of things to come. All opinion polls predict that the Islamist Muslim Brotherhood—which has long sought the imposition of strict sharia law and Israel's destruction—will emerge from next month's parliamentary elections as the country's strongest political party, perhaps even with an outright majority. An Islamist may well win the presidential elections that are scheduled to follow, if the army allows them to go forward.
And the Sinai Peninsula bordering Israel and the Gaza Strip has become, following Mubarak’s fall, a lawless, Islamist-dominated territory. Egyptian writ runs (barely) only in the northeastern (El Arish-Rafah) and southeastern (Sharm a-Sheikh) fringes. The peninsula's interior is in the grip of Islamists and bedouin gunmen and smugglers and has become a major staging post for Iranian arms smuggling into the Hamas-ruled Gaza Strip.
For months now the Egyptian natural gas pipeline to Israel (and Jordan) has been cut, the military unable to prevent continued incidents of Islamist-beduin sabotage. The severance of the gas export—in effect, a continuing Egyptian violation of an international commercial agreement—has meant that Israel has had to dole out hundreds of millions of additional dollars for liquid fuel to run its electricity grid.
And last week witnessed a further, violent aftereffect of the "Arab Spring"—three Grad rockets (advanced Katyushas), launched from the Gaza Strip, landed 20-25 miles away in open fields outside the central Israeli cities of Ashdod and Rehovot. There were no casualties and air force jets hit what Israel called "terrorist" targets in the strip in retaliation (apparently also causing no casualties).
But the direction is clear. After the Israel-Hamas prisoner exchange, the region may be heading toward increased violence. If so, such violence would be part and parcel of the unfolding Islamisation of the region—both in terms of the anti-Zionist Islamist ethos and attendant concrete developments on the ground, one of which is the giant arms smuggling operations that have followed the downfall of Gaddafi. Thus, the "Arab Spring" has brought both Islamization and chaos (and the Islamization will only benefit from this transitional chaos). Ordinary smugglers have collaborated with Islamists to plunder Qaddafi's armories, and the Middle East's clandestine arms bazaars are awash with Grads and relatively sophisticated shoulder-held anti-aircraft missiles. Israeli intelligence says that many of these weapons have recently made their way into the Gaza Strip via the Sinai Peninsula. One anti-aircraft missile was fired at an Israeli helicopter in a recent skirmish on the Sinai-Israel border.






Comments
It's funny knowing that Mr. Morris' take on the meaning of all of what he wrote here is so diametrically opposite from mine. But the lesson that I at least get from this fine tour d'horizon of his is how dumb it has been for Israel not to have made peace long before all this upheaval occurred bringing all its new threats and dangers to Israel with it. Of course it might also be that but for the I/P conflict not having been resolved long ago all the extended and involved consequences of its continuation have mightily contributed to all this Islamic upheaval which then might not even be occurring now. Certainly a goodly part of this upheaval is due to the Islamic population's disgust over the puppetization of so many of their leaders by the West trying to help Israel. Even if somewhat speculative though what again seems almost certain is that if Israel had indeed made peace with the Palestinians and the Syrians some time ago it would have far far less to fear from all this Arab Spring business than Mr. Morris clearly appreciates now. It's called "strategic thinking," or at least "facing reality" in recognizing that Israel does indeed live as a small non-Islamic island in a very very large Islamic sea, as opposed to such ideas as ... "let's keep hanging onto and gobbling evermore Palestinian and Syrian land while the Islamic masses in the region are quiescent because of course they will remain quiescent forever...."
"...how dumb it has been for Israel not to have made peace long before all this upheaval occurred..."Perhaps we should ask, with whom should have Israel made peace...??Reaching an accommodation of peaceful coexistence between Arab and Jew, between the Muslim-Arab world, local and regional, and the nation-state of the Jewish people, Israel, has been a strategic goal of all of Israel's governments, all of them. And all of them have gone over and beyond all expectations to achieve this goal. But, there must be a party on the other side interested in reaching such an accommodation as well. And, to date, no Muslim-Arab leader, local or regional, would make the simlest and only declarative move of accepting Israel's RIGHT to be - not only the FACT that for now it is... - to exist as the independent nation-state of the Jewish people; a move that would be based on Israel's right to do so historically, ethically and legally. It is high time we were a bit more instrospective and questioned ourselves, and others: why do they categorically object to Israel's RIGHT to exist as the indepdendent nation-state of the Jewish people on ANY parcel of land between the River and the Sea...??!!