China Carrier Demo Module Highlights Surging Navy

Shanghai’s Changxing Island Shipyard, already home to both conventional-submarine and civil production, now appears to be preparing to construct China’s first indigenous aircraft carrier. Internet and satellite photos have emerged of a hull module whose limited dimensions suggest that it represents a cost-controlled demonstration of relevant construction capabilities. Its configuration may foreshadow improvements on China’s first aircraft carrier, the refitted ex-Soviet Liaoning. While this particular module may never be incorporated directly into an initial homegrown flattop, whose construction is unlikely to be rushed, China’s naval shipbuilding has become proficient at modular construction. China’s military shipbuilders already use modular construction techniques at Jiangnan Shipyard for Type 052-series destroyers, at Hudong-Zhonghua Shipyard for the Type 071 amphibious vessel, and in at least four shipyards for the new Type 056 corvette—which itself was reportedly preceded by a demonstration module at Hudong-Zhonghua. Now these latest photos raise important questions: how capable is China’s military shipbuilding industry, and what can it actually deliver?

This is part of a larger pattern in which outside analysts have repeatedly underestimated the speed and sophistication of China’s military-technological development. China’s political and economic capacity to invest financial and human capital in multiple new programs is unparalleled. While it remains uncertain how rapidly China’s aviation industry and other less-dynamic sectors can transform a growing glut of projects into high-performing finished products, China’s shipbuilding industry already has proven production capabilities. Here China is simultaneously developing and producing seven types of submarines and surface combatants; a number matched only by the United States.

During the 2000-10 global commodity boom—in which China’s booming growth and appetite for iron ore, oil, and other raw materials was a core theme—Chinese shipyards surged to become the world’s largest in terms of raw deadweight tonnage produced per year. The civilian shipbuilding boom did not directly translate into military shipbuilding capability. But it nonetheless contributed to China’s current investments in naval shipbuilding because the country’s growing civilian maritime trade and merchant marine helped create a social and political consensus in China that civilian maritime capacity must be backed by a powerful navy.

In contrast, the United States no longer has a significant civil shipbuilding industry and struggles to produce military ships on time and within budget. Based on these current production trends, on American shipyards’ rapid workforce aging and loss of human capital, and on Beijing’s desire for a fleet that makes it a major naval player in the western Pacific and gradually beyond, it is quite possible that within a decade China may lead the world in warship output.

China’s Shipbuilding Industry

Shipyards controlled by two enterprises—China State Shipbuilding Corporation (CSSC) and China Shipbuilding Industry Corporation (CSIC)—build essentially all of China’s surface combatants and submarines. The fact that CSIC personnel design the ships and CSSC personnel actually build them suggests that the decision Beijing took to split the original CSSC into the modern CSSC and CSIC in July 1999 primarily affected the commercial shipbuilding businesses that each enterprise runs and that the military construction business is, at a fundamental level, one where the company split is largely symbolic. It also strongly suggests that competition in China’s naval shipbuilding business is not so much between the CSSC and CSIC parent companies as it is among the individual shipyards themselves.

More by


jkbrent (August 17, 2013 - 8:54am)

There is no surging Chinese Navy. China's naval expansion is the biggest military hoax since Patton's First US Army Group prior to D-Day 1944. China's real money spent is on its massive sized land forces and they have but one and only one target, Russia. What I don't understand as a journalist, former military contractor and US Navy Veteran who worked in Intelligence, is why on earth so many in defense and foreign policy circles of the United States fall for this nonsense, yet totally ignore achievements of the Indian and Japanese navies in indegenous carrier building programs. Most especially Japan; the nation which pioneered carrier battle groups and employed them in combat, at a time when the US Navy still considered carriers as no more than aerial scout carriers for battleship fleets. China, does not have any modern experience of it's own to draw on for developing a 'brown shoe navy' nor do they have the technical knowledege to even make their own fan blades for jet engines. They have to buy them from Russia. India on the other hand, has it's own developed aircraft industry, and several decades of operating aircraft carriers. Yet, American 'armchair' admirals and self-appointed geniuses at the Pentagon continue to suffer from 'China Syndrome' and uphold these pikers as if they're going to launch the Federation Starship Enterprise or Battlestar Galactica any day now. They're either total fools themselves, or their getting paid very well by someone in Beijing.

Follow The National Interest

April 17, 2014