Accosted on Kingsway

Last week I had a rather ambivalent experience at the London School of Economics which may point to something beyond the personal—indeed, about where Britain, and possibly Western Europe as a whole, are heading.

I was invited to lecture on the first Arab-Israeli war of 1948. A few hours earlier, a fire had broken out in a nearby building and Kingsway was sealed off, so the taxi dropped me off a few blocks away. As I walked down Kingsway, a major London thoroughfare, a small mob—I don't think any other word is appropriate—of some dozen Muslims, Arabs and their supporters, both men and women, surrounded me and, walking alongside me for several hundred yards as I advanced towards the building where the lecture was to take place, raucously harangued and bated me with cries of "fascist," "racist," "England should never have allowed you in," "you shouldn't be allowed to speak." Several spoke in broken, obviously newly acquired, English. Violence was thick in the air though none was actually used. Passersby looked on in astonishment, and perhaps shame, but it seemed the sight of angry bearded, caftaned Muslims was sufficient to deter any intervention. To me, it felt like Brownshirts in a street scene in 1920s Berlin—though on Kingsway no one, to the best of my recall, screamed the word "Jew."

In the lecture hall, after a cup of tea, the session, with an audience of some 350 students and others, passed remarkably smoothly. Entry required tickets, which were freely dispensed upon the provision of name and address. The LSE had beefed up security and several bobbies stood outside the building confronting the dozen or so demonstrators who held aloft placards stating "Benni Morris is a Fascist," "Go home," etc. Inside, in the lecture hall, surprisingly, there was absolute silence during my talk; you could have heard a pin drop. The Q and A session afterwards was by and large civilized, though several Muslim participants, including girls with scarves, displayed anger and dismissiveness. One asserted: "You are not an historian"; another, more delicately, suggested that the lecturer "professes to be a serious historian." However, the overwhleming majority of the audience was respectful and, in my view, appreciative (to judge by the volume of clapping at the end of the lecture and at the end of the Q and A), but a small minority jeered and clapped loudly when anti-Zionist questions or points were raised.

The manner of our exit from the lecture hall was also noteworthy. The chairman asked the audience to stay in their seats until the group on stage departed. I was ushered by the security team down an elevator and through a narrow basement passage full of kitchen stores and out a side entrance. Like an American president in a B-rated thriller.

Another disconcerting element in what went on in the lecture hall was the hosting LSE professor's brief introductory remarks, which failed completely to note the harrassment and intimidation (of which he had been made fully aware) of the lecturer on Kingsway, or to criticize them in any way. My assumption was that some were LSE students.

There was a sense that the chairman was deliberately displaying caution in view of the world in which he lives. Which brings me back to what happened on Kingsway.

Uncurbed, Muslim intimidation in the public domain of people they see as disagreeing with them is palpable and palpably affecting the British Christian majority among whom they live, indeed, cowing them into silence. One senses real fear (perhaps a corner was turned with the Muslim reactions around the world to the "Mohammed cartoons" and the responses in the West to these reactions.) Which, if true, is a sad indication of what is happening in the historic mother of democracies and may point to what is happening, and will increasingly happen, in Western Europe in general in the coming decades. (A video of the LSE talk is on the website. A Muslim cameraman also made a video of the mob scene on Kingsway and posted it on the web—but appears to have thought better of it and subsequently removed it.)

Image by Aude

More by

Comments

OzArizona (June 21, 2011 - 5:38am)

Nothing ambivalent in this experience. You were, after all, lecturing in Londonistan. As an Australian of similar age to Israel (born late 1947) I once admired British culture, but no more. I would be too cowardly myself to intervene in that scene, I shrink from aggressive looking Muslim males even here. All the same, I am disgusted. I wish I knew what else an old lady like me could do. Apart from pray. And to send you my best wishes all the same.

OzArizona (June 21, 2011 - 6:36am)

Well, I just had a look at the video of the talk. The last 10-15 mins were especially distressing with the speaker unable to finish his answers to the questions and the chairman behaving very lamely. I think you've been very generous in your description of this event. I don't know how you put up with such abuse. I don't think I could do it myself. It is very courageous of you. And again, I can only wish you well in these endeavours.

R.G. (June 24, 2011 - 8:34am)

By Benny Morris' own admission, the 'mob' he describes did not behave violently, and expecting passing Londoners to intervene in a street scene is highly unrealistic - they were most probably uninterested rather than 'cowed'. Mr Morris expresses concern over the fate of Western democracy but a vital part of democracy is allowing members of society to express dissent by means of non-violent protest; if the 'mob' or the audience had violated these rules of conduct then surely Mr Morris would be pointing that out rather than dwelling on the fact that some protesters had accents, beards or non-Western dress, or that "several girls with scarves displayed anger and dismissiveness" in the discussion. It is true that jeering at others' questions is childish and inappropriate, and does not reflect well on these particular members of the audience, but it is hard to understand what Mr Morris expects the LSE to do about this behaviour - anyone who is prepared to give a public lecture which is by its nature controversial will inevitably attract some critical attention and he does mention that this was coming from a small minority of participants. 

Richard Tebboth (June 24, 2011 - 6:11pm)

I apologise for the abuse you received.I was at the lecture; I asked the question about the prospects for the 'two state solution' - I intend to ask it again next Monday at a lecture from Sheikh Raed Salah.Meanwhile the analysis presented by Professor Amos Oz at the Presidential Conference in Jerusalem last Tuesday has had little coverage. A podcast does not seem to be available but ...http://heebonics.blogspot.com/2011/06/amos-oz-gets-booed-at-presidential.html 

Richard Tebboth (June 24, 2011 - 6:24pm)

PS Films reccently screened in London document somewhat greater violence in Israel and the OPT. Budrus: follows the struggle of a father and daughter team who fight to save their village from imminent destruction at the hands of the IDF's Separation Barrier.Israel vs Israel - Director Terje Carlsson- depicts the divisive politics in Israel and the demonisation of Jewish peace activists and campaigners as traitors.

Danny Black (June 26, 2011 - 4:25pm)

 r

Follow The National Interest

February 23, 2012