I Was in Turkey During the Ankara Attack
Looking out across the beautiful Mediterranean in southwestern Turkey on Saturday morning at the annual Bodrum Roundtable, it would have been easy to forget about the turmoil raging around me.
Countless Syrian refugees died trying to cross that very same bay to reach the Greek island of Kos, the closest entry point to the European Union. Just a few months ago, a young Syrian boy tragically washed up on these shores, and with a single photo, catapulted the dire consequences of the Syrian conflict onto screens around the world. Little did I know that this same morning would be marked by the deadliest terrorist attack in Turkey’s history.
As I sat among international affairs experts listening to former President Abdullah Gul deliver a rare keynote address, at a little past 10am local time, phone calls began to flood the room. A CNN Turk producer and Kurdish People’s Party (HDP) parliamentarian abruptly left. A quick check of my twitter feed reported a terrorist attack at a pro-Kurdish peace rally in the heart of Turkey’s capital Ankara, a place I had once called home.
President Gul, widely considered the only Turkish leader capable of challenging Erdogan, began taking questions on when he might re-enter politics an aide slipped him a note with the latest news of the attack. With a resigned and sad shake of his head he acknowledged the note, and told the assembled group that he had just learned of an attack in Ankara, hoping and praying it would have minimal causalities. His response sounded like that of a politician not considering retirement but also not willing to challenge the front-runner—a Turkish Joe Biden. Tragically, the attack left over a 100 dead and hundreds more injured just three weeks before national elections leaving his country on the verge of a full-scale civil war.
Once back in the U.S. and listening to the first Democratic Presidential Debate, it was as if this seismic attack had not happened. Though Syria figured prominently, there were few concrete answers and no reference to the challenges lying ahead for Turkey. If anything, Syria was merely a pretext to discuss Russia’s dramatic entrance into the conflict and how candidates would address this seeming challenge to American leadership. What was missing from the conversation was that Russia’s involvement has left both the Kurds and Turkey feeling more isolated than ever before—despite both being necessary to defeat the self-proclaimed Islamic State. In such a gloomy scenario was there any room for hope?
Sitting next to President Gul, all of us intently listening to a discussion on transatlantic security challenges while monitoring the latest news, felt reassuring—and leads me to have a cautious optimism. But not for the reasons you may think.
Unlike before the “Arab Spring,” where Turkey was seen as a rare Muslim-majority tolerant democracy, the dour state of affairs today have now exploded into the open intertwined with regional factors and could come to a head on November 1 in the voting booths. It would be a mistake to not forcefully defend Turkey’s democracy through free and fair elections, freedom of the press, and individual rights that have suffered in the last few years. But, it would be equally misguided not to seize the opportunity to embrace a traumatized Ankara. And it is this opportunity that stokes my optimism.
While it may appear that authoritarianism is on the rise at the expense of weakened and seemingly feckless democratic leaders, it is important for the West, and particularly the U.S., to fully embrace Turkey—not just through security guarantees but through more active commercial and economic diplomacy ahead of the G-20 summit that will be hosted in Turkey in just over a month.
Meanwhile, Turkey’s own Kurdish problems at home have been exacerbated by tensions with the U.S. over how to best utilize Kurdish forces on the ground in Syria to defeat the common enemy of the Islamic State. Do not let this distract, though. Turkey’s four decade long struggle with the PKK has overshadowed all of the progress made for Kurds in Turkey and this should be viewed against the backdrop of a pro-Kurdish party on the domestic scene that, for the first time, seems to offer genuine hope of a political compromise instead of a senseless cycle of violence within the country that has been tried before.
Words of friendship and support are nice, but they are not enough for Ankara today. A full embrace of this difficult NATO ally has never been more necessary from Washington. This begins with ironclad, unambiguous security guarantees about Turkey’s sovereignty and its right to defend itself against any external forces--namely Russia with its egregious airspace violations. It continues with a redoubled international humanitarian aid effort for Syrian refugees and counter-terrorism cooperation centered on Turkey beginning at the G-20 Summit next month, a point of tremendous pride for the Turkish people. It also includes a serious conversation about how to include Ankara in the TTIP negotiations and strengthen a shaken Turkish economy with a new government post elections.