Iran's role in Syria is part of a broader campaign to rebuild the broken regional order on its own terms.
The new policy creates more questions than answers.
Obama announces deeper involvement in Syria. What now?
Those pushing Obama to action in defense of his red lines were the ones who wanted the lines drawn in the first place.
Admitting Iran to peace talks on Syria shouldn't be seen as a reward or concession.
Guns for "good guys" committing atrocities should be a no-go.
Apparently contradictory statements on Syria have emerged, shedding light on the dilemma Israel faces on its northeastern border.
It's the shattered nation's best hope. And it's not likely to work.
Rice and Power exemplify the dangers of making future policy from a simplistic reading of the past.
The Atlantic alliance said it wouldn't go into Libya, but did. On Syria, the same promises are more credible.
Russia's S300 system is formidible, but not if the Syrians can't operate it.
Will the flypaper theory of counterterrorism work in Syria?
Washington needs to make sure the anti-Assad fighters aren't pushing its diplomacy around.
Could the Dayton agreement be a model for ending the Syrian civil war?
Stay informed on our latest news!
Follow The National Interest