The United States doesn’t really know how to build nations anywhere, even when security conditions are relatively good. How can we expect to succeed in Afghanistan?
More troops won’t fix Afghanistan. Our best bet is to create Afghan partners who can fight terrorists on their own.
America is close to losing some of its key allies. A rift has formed with Germany over Afghanistan, and Europe is searching for an exit strategy. Will Obama do the same?
The winner of the Afghan presidential elections won't matter. To stabilize the country, we should instead talk to the most important political force in Pashtun areas—the Taliban.
Europe will never have its own military capabilities unless America stops subsidizing its defense.
Obama’s Afghan strategy is smart and realistic. But he needs to convince the American people it will work.
NATO’s continued relevance depends on its ability to function in Afghanistan. So far, the alliance hasn’t delivered.
Obama’s plan for Afghanistan is the right idea, but directed at the wrong place. Instead of sending troops to Taliban strongholds, we should bulk up Kabul’s defenses.
NATO's new war on drugs in Afghanistan will put troops in greater danger for a venture that may not even work. It just might be the straw that breaks the alliance's back.
The willingness of some NATO countries to put their own troops in the line of fire and take the political heat can probably survive Taliban attacks—but not the perception that they are being played by more cynical allies.