It is time to move forward in Iraq by moving out.
(This "Realist" column will appear as part of The National Interest's summer 2004 symposium, "Iraq at the Turn.
In the wake of the president's speech this past week, pundits and practitioners are offering their own counsel as to what to do about Iraq.
As news of the Abu Ghraib scandal and Nicholas Berg's beheading dominates the headlines, American media have all but ignored one of the most significant developments since President Bush's now-famous 2002 "axis of evil" statement.
In the United States we dismiss those who tell us that our actions will have consequences.
The economy functions in the same way the video image and soundtrack combine to form a movie.
The transatlantic dialogue remains one of the premier issues for discussion in the pages of The National Interest and its weekly online supplement, In the National Interest.
In August 2001, a former chief terrorism expert at the Department of State wrote in the New York Times that the Bush Administration was obsessed with terrorism and using it to persuade the American people to build missile defenses.
Historians sifting through President Ronald Reagan's papers may find no subject as riveting or controversial as his policies on nuclear weapons and arms control.
On November 3, 1774, upon his election to represent the city of Bristol in the House of Commons, Edmund Burke decided to clarify a few things to his constituents.