Why Another ROK - North Korea Summit Won’t Change Anything

August 2, 2021 Topic: North Korea Region: Asia Blog Brand: Korea Watch Tags: Kim Jong UnNorth KoreaMoon Jae InSouth KoreaSummit

Why Another ROK - North Korea Summit Won’t Change Anything

Summit hype today is far lower than it was in 2018, if only because no one really expects much from such meetings anymore. 

There is talk in South Korea of another summit between its president, Moon Jae-in, and North Korean supreme leader Kim Jong-un. Ostensibly on the agenda is reopening communications between the two sides, with the hardly disguised hope of bringing Kim to the table for wider discussions and, ideally, nudging him to speak to the Americans. 

Moon and Kim have met three times already and little has come of the meetings. Some minor inter-Korean deals were struck, but their primary purpose was to lay the groundwork for a North Korean-U.S. rapprochement. The North takes inter-Korean summits less seriously than the South does, as the North is focused on the United States and tends to read the South as a junior alliance partner whose foreign policy is dominated by the Americans. 

North Korea is content to chat with South Korea, but it rarely makes major deals or concessions with the South. The North assumes the Americans put constraints on the South’s bargaining space. This may not but formally true, but it is likely informally true. More importantly, the North wants the prestige of speaking to the Americans. It wants the global superpower to treat it as an equal sovereign state, and as an equal Korean state. Playing hard to get with the South and reserving its main energies for the Americans also snubs South Korea and reminds it that the North views it as an American lackey despite all its superior wealth and modernity. 

This raises the question of the purpose of yet another summit. That is not necessarily a reason to refrain from meeting again. It is always possible that one more meeting might be the one where the North finally starts to negotiate seriously with the South. Given just how dangerous North Korea is, it is usually best to keep on engaging, to keep on trying. 

Certainly, the South Korean government wants these meetings to lead to progress. Moon has been trying for years to forge his own inter-Korean peace track without tying every serious change on the peninsula to U.S.-North progress. This has not worked to date, but it is a deeply held belief of Moon’s left-wing coalition that the South must continually try to engage the North, even if that means distance from the Americans, who—ex-President Donald Trump’s made-for-TV summits aside—tend to be much more skeptical of leader-level meetings with the North. 

This also goes down uneasily with the South Korean public, with whom the U.S. alliance is popular. Past inter-Korean summits have mostly been pageantry, primarily because the North insists on serious dealing only with the Americans, which do not encourage enthusiasm. Summit hype today is far lower than it was in 2018, if only because no one really expects much from such meetings anymore. Moon’s coalition will support his effort of course, but the South Korean center has lost faith in Moon’s ability to bring Pyongyang to the table. Meanwhile, the staunchly anti-communist South Korean Right is now deeply suspicious that Moon is a North Korean sympathizer. 

So, it increasingly looks like this would be more process for process’ sake. The logic here is that if the United States keeps talking and talking to North Korea, then a breakthrough might somehow occur. Also, at minimum, North Korea will not launch a provocation on the border if talks are in progress. 

Finally, the real reason for any further summit is likely that Moon is desperate because he has bet his presidency on a North Korea breakthrough. 

Moon ran for president on a domestic program of social democracy, emphasizing issues like transparency, reducing corruption, equity, and so on. This fairly typical left-of-center messaging plays well in South Korea, where there is a strong perception that business and political elites are an unaccountable dominant class. Moon’s foreign policy views—to robustly engage Pyongyang—were known but not the focus of his campaign. 

Now, Moon’s focus on the North has completely taken over his efforts and energies. His leadership on the coronavirus pandemic has been excellent, and last year’s world-class quarantine effort has justifiably propped up his polling. But it is a revolution in North-South relations that truly moves him, and he has more strenuously—or more slavishly, according to his critics—engaged the North than any of his predecessors. 

Unfortunately for his legacy though, little concrete has come of all this effort. Moon met Kim three times; Trump met Kim three times. There was enormous hype for years. Before the pandemic, I attended one conference after another about ending the Korean war via a North-South “peace regime” or “peace economy,” sanctions rollback, mutual disarmament, and so on. There was a tremendous vibe of movement and change. Moon relentlessly talked this up in his speeches. So enthusiastic was he in comparison to the unchangingly dour North Korean response that South Korean conservatives started calling him North Korea’s foreign minister. 

Now, as Moon slides into lame-duck status with the presidential election less than a year away, he is almost certainly desperate. He took a big gamble on the North and he has precious little to show for it. The situation on the ground—North Korea’s gulags, forward-deployed forces flush against the demilitarized zone, weapons of mass destruction, a deal with the Americans—remains completely unrealized. 

Moon will try again. He has no other play. But the optics will be uncomfortable. Moon has already been criticized in the press for cloying supineness before Kim in his desperation for a deal, especially now that new team of President Joe Biden clearly signaled that they are just waiting Moon out. Thus, it is unlikely that Kim will agree to another summit. 

Robert E. Kelly is a professor of international relations in the Department of Political Science and Diplomacy at Pusan National University. 

Image: Reuters