The Case for Less Nuclear, and More Diesel, Submarines for the U.S. Navy

The Case for Less Nuclear, and More Diesel, Submarines for the U.S. Navy

If it does things wisely, the U.S. Navy can turn technical shortcomings to strategic and political advantage.

The MITRE proposal, then, deserves a fair hearing—not denunciation. Every ship in a global navy need not be a globe-spanning ship. Diesel submarines are an option for the future U.S. Navy. Whether to exercise that option is the question before Congress and the navy.

James Holmes is J. C. Wylie Chair of Maritime Strategy at the Naval War College and author of “Visualize Chinese Sea Power,” in the current issue of the Naval Institute Proceedings. The views voiced here are his alone.

This first appeared earlier and is being reposted due to reader interest.

Image: Reuters.