Russia vs. NATO: Who Would Win in a War for the Baltics?

August 12, 2020 Topic: Security Region: Europe Blog Brand: The Reboot Tags: RussiaNATOBalticsWarMilitaryTechnologyWorld

Russia vs. NATO: Who Would Win in a War for the Baltics?

Russia has clearly postured itself in response to NATO as though it can counter-balance or deter the alliance.

Analysts have also said that the Russian military made huge amounts of conventional and nuclear weapons in the 80s, ranging from rockets and cruise missiles to very effective air defenses.

In fact, the Russian built S-300 and S-400 anti-aircraft air defenses, if maintained and modernized, are said to be particularly effective, experts have said.

In the air, the Russian have maintained their 1980s built Su-27 fighter jets, which have been postured throughout the region by the Russian military.

Often compared to the U.S. Air Force’s F-15 Eagle fighter, the Su-27 is a maneuverable twin engine fighter built in the 1980s and primarily configured for air superiority missions.

While many experts maintain that NATO’s size, fire-power, air supremacy and technology would ultimately prevail in a substantial engagement with Russia, that does not necessarily negate the Rand study’s findings that NATO would be put in a terrible predicament should Russia invade the Baltic states. 

This story originally appeared in Scout Warrior.

Image: Reuters