China's Aircraft Carrier: The Ultimate Weapon or Paper Tiger?

December 27, 2016 Topic: Security Region: Asia Blog Brand: The Buzz Tags: ChinaAircraft CarrierMilitaryTechnologyChinese NavyTaiwan

China's Aircraft Carrier: The Ultimate Weapon or Paper Tiger?

Did Beijing just threaten to send its carrier to the West Coast of the United States? 

A recent op-ed in the Chinese state-run Global Times confirms what military analysts have been saying for years: China wants to turn its one aircraft carrier into a much larger force of multiple carriers that can be used to gain geostrategic advantage over America. 

The op-ed, posted on December 25, also warns America what may come next for China's flattops:

"The Chinese fleet will cruise to the Eastern Pacific sooner or later. When China’s aircraft carrier fleet appears in offshore areas of the US one day, it will trigger intense thinking about maritime rules.

The distant sailing of the Chinese aircraft carrier fleet is not aimed at provoking the US nor at reshaping maritime strategic structure. But if the fleet is able to enter areas where the US has core interests, the situation when the US unilaterally imposes pressure on China will change.

China should speed up launching its new aircraft carriers so as to activate their combat.

In addition, China needs to think about setting up navy supply points in South America right now."

Bold words indeed. But just how much of a threat are China's one and future carriers? Dave Majumdar, TNI's Defense Editor, took this question on back late in 2015. The full text below is reposted for your reading pleasure. Let the debate begin: 


In the decades since the end of the Second World War, the U.S. Navy’s carrier strike groups have been the dominant force across the world’s oceans. Even the Soviet Union never really managed to challenge the U.S. Navy’s mastery of the seas. But as of late, there is growing concern that China’s People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) may be stepping up to the plate.

The Soviets mainly focused their efforts on a “ sea denial ” strategy using a combination of Backfire bombers, submarines and surface combatant armed with long-range anti-ship missiles. The People’s Republic of China also seemed to be focusing purely on developing an anti-access strategy using similar methodology. But like the Soviets toward the end of the Cold War, the Chinese seem to be intent on developing a blue water surface fleet that might one day be able to challenge the U.S. Navy on the high seas.

Picking up where the Soviets left off, China has refurbished the decaying hulk of the  Varyag—sister ship to Russia’s  Admiral Kuznetsov—and recommissioned her as the  Liaoning. But the  Liaoning is just a starting point—the PLAN appears to be using the ship as a training tool to develop the skills necessary to operate a carrier air wing at sea. It’s a skill that took the U.S. Navy decades to master after much trial and error.

To master the air wing component, China appropriated an early Soviet prototype of the Su-33, which is a carrier-based version of the Flanker air superiority fighter. The Russian aircraft gave the Chinese a leg up in the development of a carrier-based warplane called the J-15. Further, the Chinese are developing a host of support aircraft that will also serve in a future PLAN carrier air wing. Right now, that air wing is composed of twenty-four J-15 fighters, six Z-18F anti-submarine warfare helicopters, four Z-18J airborne early warning helicopters and a pair of Z-9C rescue helicopters.

The Pentagon says in its  2015 report on Chinese military power  that Liaoning and its air wing, as currently configured, are not really capable of projecting power over great distances—even if it were fully operational. The ship is too small and is best suited for providing fleet air defense and extending air cover over a fleet operating far from shore. “The  Liaoning will not enable long-range power projection similar to U.S. Nimitz-class carriers,” the report states.

The fundamental problem is that even though the J-15 is a better performing aircraft in terms of pure aerodynamic performance compared to the U.S. Navy’s Boeing F/A-18E/F Super Hornet, the Russian ski-jump design imposes severe limitations on the payload and fuel the Flanker can carry. “ Liaoning’s smaller size limits the number of aircraft it can embark, while the ski-jump configuration limits restricts fuel and ordnance load,” the Pentagon report states. That’s not just the Pentagon’s assessment; the  Chinese have also acknowledged the issue . Perhaps most telling is that the Soviet Union’s follow-on to the  Kuznetsov-class design,  Ulyanovsk, incorporated steam catapults.

China is expected to build or may already be  building follow-on carriers —and the Pentagon expects that the PLAN might build several—which are likely to be designed to use the J-15’s full capabilities. In the best case scenario, it will take quite some time for the People’s Republic to field a fleet that’s anywhere remotely close to being able to challenge the U.S. Navy. It takes Newport News the better part of a decade to build a single  Nimitz or Ford-class supercarrier and that yard has decades of experience. China has no experience building any ship the size of an aircraft carrier—even a moderate-sized one like  Liaoning, which was structurally completed in Crimea.