Boeing's F-15X vs. Lockheed Martin's Stealth F-35: Let the Showdown Begin

March 6, 2019 Topic: Security Blog Brand: The Buzz Tags: F-15XF-35MilitaryTechnologyWorldBoeingLockheed Martin

Boeing's F-15X vs. Lockheed Martin's Stealth F-35: Let the Showdown Begin

What is the right mix of 4th and 5th generation fighters? 

The Pentagon reportedly will request around $8 billion to buy just 78 F-35 stealth fighters in its 2020 budget proposal. That's six fewer than the military projected.

The U.S. Air Force would get all 48 F-35As it expected to buy. But even that quantity is far smaller than the 72 new fighters per years the flying branch says it must acquire in order to replace older jets before they become obsolete.

The 24-fighter shortfall is central to the ongoing debate over the U.S. Defense Department's decision essentially to force the Air Force to buy the F-15X, an upgraded version of a nearly 50-year-old fighter that Boeing last built for the Air Force in 2001.

The Pentagon’s Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation Office is the main champion of the F-15X. The office of Acting Secretary of Defense Patrick Shanahan, a former Boeing executive, was friendly to CAPE's argument that the Air Force should acquire F-15Xs alongside "fifth-generation" F-35s.

OSD inserted into the budget proposal $1.2 billion for F-15Xs. The Air Force reportedly would get eight F-15Xs in 2020 and another 72 in later years. The new F-15s would replace 35-year-old F-15Cs on a one-for-one basis in the nine squadrons operate the type -- six in the Air National Guard and three in the active force.

The Air Force is caught in the middle. As recently as September 2018, Air Force Secretary Heather Wilson rejected the idea of buying any more "fourth-generation" fighters such as the F-15.

"We are currently 80 percent fourth-gen aircraft and 20 percent fifth-generation aircraft," Wilson said. "In any of the fights that we have been asked to plan for, more fifth-gen aircraft make a huge difference. We think that getting to 50-50 means not buying new fourth-gen aircraft. It means continuing to increase the fifth generation."

But the Air Force needs new fighters. A lot more of them than it has bought in recent years. As of early 2019, the average age of the flying branch's approximately 1,900 fighters was 27 years.

"We want to buy new airplanes," Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Dave Goldfein told reporters in March 2019.

"We want to buy 72 aircraft a year," Wilson added, according to Defense News reporter Valerie Insinna.

But officials acknowledge that the F-35 -- in particular, its basing and maintenance -- is too expensive. The high cost prevents the Air Force from reaching its longstanding goal of annually buying at least 80 F-35s.

"What’s really important for people to always takeaway is I’ve found the aircraft -- the F-35 as a product, its capability and performance -- to be eye-watering," Shanahan told Bloomberg. "It is high, high-performing -- no ambiguity -- no ifs, ands or buts."

But the military and Lockheed Martin have mismanaged the F-35 program, Shanahan said. "This is the largest program in DoD history and the cost of sustainment is about the same cost as nuclear modernization," the acting defense secretary said.

The Congressional Budget Office estimated that the F-35 program -- acquisition and sustainment -- could cost as much as $1 trillion over its roughly 50-year duration.

Buying a mix of F-15Xs and F-35s would save money, Gen. Mike Holmes, head of Air Combat Command, told reporters.

"There’s more to think about than just the acquisition cost. There’s the cost to operate the airplane over time. There’s the cost to transition at the installations where the airplanes are — does it require new military construction, does it require extensive retraining of the people and then how long does it take?" Holmes said.

"We’re pretty confident to say that we can go cheaper getting 72 airplanes with a mix of fifth- and fourth-gen than we did if we did all fifth-gen."

The non-stealthy F-15Xs presumably would replace F-15s flying low-risk homeland-defense patrols over the United States. By contrast, F-35s with their stealth features would deploy overseas for major combat against high-tech foes.

Even so, some former generals vehemently oppose the F-15X. The Boeing fighters are "unable to survive against the threats of biggest concern in our national-defense strategy." David Deptula, a retired general and former F-15 pilot who is now the dean of the Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies in Virginia, wrote in a February 2019 op-ed for Forbes.

"No amount of capacity can overcome an inability to penetrate modern defenses and destroy high-value targets — severe limitations of the F-15X," wrote John Michael Loh, a retired general who served as the U.S. Air Force vice chief of staff and the commander of Air Combat Command.

Congress could intervene to increase the number of F-35s in the budget. It also could block the request for F-15Xs, as some pro-Lockheed lawmakers have threatened to do. The fighter debate continues as the budget process grinds on.

David Axe serves as Defense Editor of the National Interest. He is the author of the graphic novels  War FixWar Is Boring and Machete Squad.

Image: Creative Commons.