The Army has been upgrading and augmenting its attack system for its Abrams tank to ensure a clearer targeting view for gunners looking to find, engage and destroy targets.
The effort involves upgrading and modifying Kongsberg’s Common Remotely Operated Weapons Station, a combat-tested technology wherein attacking soldiers can control and fire a vehicle weapon from beneath the protection of armor by virtue of looking at a video screen and leveraging advanced fire-control technology.
Kongsberg took 300 systems and manufactured the smaller, lower profile systems the Army wanted to change as a way to help modify the weapons system for more efficient use. Low Profile Crew Remotely Operated Weapons Station (CROWS) remain in production for the Abrams and various U.S. allied systems. Kongsberg is the sole provider for Remote Weapons Systems throughout DoD and, company developers say, has worked to sustain combat-tested systems and also adapt to a new, fast-changing threat environment through innovations.
“Low Profile CROWS is a shorter version of CROWS. It is built with a 10-in reduction to build a shorter system because requirements from the Abrams community included not having any field of view obstruction,” Scott Burk, vice president, Kongsberg Defense, told The National Interest in an interview.
CROWS continues to be upgraded with new fire-control technology, AI and higher-fidelity long range sensors.
The systems not only arm the Abrams tank but are essentially integrated across multiple fleets in the Army, including Joint Light Tactical Vehicles, Strykers and even Humvees. Attacking or tracking targets while under armor is, it goes without saying, a huge priority for land war tacticians as soldiers can operate in war while less vulnerable to enemy fire.
Improvements to range and resolution of targeting sensors—and added integration with vehicle mounted radar and EW antennas—can greatly optimize under-armor attack possibilities, enabling various kinds of otherwise impossible armored attack maneuvers.
Newer CROWS are increasingly engineered for what Burk called “commonality” across the fleet, meaning they are architected with a technical infrastructure such that they can accommodate new weapons and threat-specific software upgrades as needed.
Burk called the upgrade effort a “tech refresh,” explaining that the upgrades bring new, previously unavailable attack technology to tactical warfare.
“We’ve always had the ability to do slew to cue taking data from one sensor, and now we are able to do that with many sensors at one time,” Burk said.
This new modification introduces some interesting tactical possibilities and lends itself to higher-speed, AI-enabled information processing of otherwise disparate pools of combat-critical sensor data. Perhaps one sensor sees enemy armored vehicles at relevant ranges closing in to contact, while yet another system discerns air targets or terrain obstacles? A single, integrated system can massively expedite sensor-to-shooter time and help contribute to the Army’s sought after “kill web” intended to connect any sensor to any shooter in real time.
Kris Osborn is the defense editor for the National Interest. Osborn previously served at the Pentagon as a Highly Qualified Expert with the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army—Acquisition, Logistics & Technology. Osborn has also worked as an anchor and on-air military specialist at national TV networks. He has appeared as a guest military expert on Fox News, MSNBC, The Military Channel, and The History Channel. He also has a Masters Degree in Comparative Literature from Columbia University.