Was Trump's Tweet at Yovanovitch Witness Intimidation?

A sign sits behind House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff, ranking member Devin Nunes, Republican counsel Steve Castor and Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) during a House Intelligence Committee hearing featuring witness Marie Yovanovitch, former U.S. ambassador
November 15, 2019 Topic: Politics Region: Americas Blog Brand: The Buzz Tags: ImpeachmentUkraineDonald TrumpWitnessDemocratic Party

Was Trump's Tweet at Yovanovitch Witness Intimidation?

Politicians and pundits chimed in.

Journalists, pundits and politicians accused President Donald Trump of witness tampering after he tweeted at former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch during her testimony Friday.

  • “Everywhere Marie Yovanovitch went turned bad … Ukrainian President spoke unfavorably about her in my second phone call with him,” Trump tweeted in part during the testimony.

  • Politicians from Hillary Clinton to Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez to Ted Cruz weighed in on House Intelligence Committee Adam Schiff’s designation of the tweets as “witness intimidation.”

Journalists, pundits and politicians accused President Donald Trump of witness tampering after he tweeted at former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch during her testimony Friday.

Yovanovitch, who said she felt threatened by Trump while working under him, was testifying before the House Intelligence Committee during the second day of public impeachment hearings when the president tweeted about her.

“Everywhere Marie Yovanovitch went turned bad. She started off in Somalia, how did that go? Then fast forward to Ukraine, where the new Ukrainian President spoke unfavorably about her in my second phone call with him. It is a U.S. President’s absolute right to appoint ambassadors,” Trump tweeted during the testimony.

“They call it ‘serving at the pleasure of the President.’ The U.S. now has a very strong and powerful foreign policy, much different than proceeding administrations. It is called, quite simply, America First! With all of that, however, I have done FAR more for Ukraine than O.,” he continued.

House Intelligence Committee Adam Schiff accused the president of witness intimidation during the hearing and read Trump’s tweet aloud to the room.

“As we sit here testifying the president is attacking you on Twitter,” Schiff said, adding, “I want to let you know, ambassador, that some of us here take witness intimidation very, very seriously.”

Fox News host Bret Baier called Schiff’s reading of the tweets a “turning point” in the hearing in a Friday tweet.

He added that Yovanovitch “was already a sympathetic witness [and] the President’s tweet ripping her allowed Schiff to point it out real time characterizing it as witness tampering or intimidation -adding an article of impeachment real-time.”

That was a turning point in this hearing so far. She was already a sympathetic witness & the President’s tweet ripping her allowed Schiff to point it out real time characterizing it as witness tampering or intimidation -adding an article of impeachment real-time. https://t.co/HSCkGMIqmH

— Bret Baier (@BretBaier) November 15, 2019

CNN legal analyst Elie Honig told CNN’s Anderson Cooper that Trump’s tweets are “textbook witness intimidation,” adding, “I’ve prosecuted witness tampering cases. I’ve tried witness tampering cases. To me this is right down the middle.”

Various pundits, journalists and politicians — both Republicans and Democrats — agreed with Schiff’s designation of the tweet as “witness intimidation.”

Witness intimidation is a crime, no matter who does it. Full stop.

— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) November 15, 2019

Trump himself is clearly not satisfied with only one article of impeachment.

His choice to publicly broadcast his own, personally authored witness intimidation means he’s wants to sign up for another article on obstruction of justice, too. https://t.co/wYvH92CMHb

— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) November 15, 2019

The president just demonstrated witness intimidation & obstruction of justice in real time. Yuvanovitch is a dedicated, truth-telling, career foreign service official who knows how to put country first, over partisanship. Trumps actions are truly dangerous. https://t.co/Ex0W6iV1lT

— Rep. Pramila Jayapal (@RepJayapal) November 15, 2019

Witness intimidation is a federal crime.

It is also an impeachable offense #AbuseOfPower.

Consider yourself warned.

No. One. Is. Above. The. Law. https://t.co/NEWIsbvy44

— Hakeem Jeffries (@RepJeffries) November 15, 2019

With Trumps tweets that’s obstruction and witness tampering live. He literally added an impeachment charge live.

— Bakari Sellers (@Bakari_Sellers) November 15, 2019

Expect witness tampering to be an article of impeachment. https://t.co/HtcXcbVgms

— Justin Amash (@justinamash) November 15, 2019

I mean, literally, Trump just committed a crime while we’re watching. It’s that simple.

— emptywheel (@emptywheel) November 15, 2019

Others, however, argued that Trump’s tweets should not be considered “witness tampering.” Republican Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, for example, called the claim “ridiculous.”

This may be the single most ridiculous claim of the Dem show trial. No, the President’s tweeting is not “witness intimidation.” You may not like the tone of some or even many of his tweets, but it’s absurd to suggest that tweeting is an impeachable “high Crime [or] Misdemeanor.” https://t.co/afuu4OWUb3

— Ted Cruz (@tedcruz) November 15, 2019

“Furthermore, it clearly hasn’t changed the fact that the witness is testifying willingly and sticking to her script,” he added.

2. Furthermore, it clearly hasn’t changed the fact that the witness is testifying willingly and sticking to her script.

— Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) November 15, 2019

As for Trump’s tweet, to call it witness intimidation is laughable. People can say whatever they want about Trump and he can’t say what he thinks? The witness has every right to speak her mind and he can speak his. If witnesses are so intimidated, why do they keep showing up?

— Ari Fleischer (@AriFleischer) November 15, 2019

Democrats bemoaning the lack of explanation for Ambassador Yovanovitch’s dismissal. The President is TRYING to explain the reason behind the reason behind his constitutionally sanctioned action on Twitter, & it’s called “witness intimidation.” He can’t win with these Democrats. pic.twitter.com/f8otyfw0Wr

— Rep Andy Biggs (@RepAndyBiggsAZ) November 15, 2019

Hearings related to the president’s phone call to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky concerning former Vice President Joe Biden’s son Hunter and his business dealings with Ukrainian gas company Burisma holdings are scheduled to continue until Nov. 21.

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected].

Image: Reuters.