F-117 Nighthawk: What if the U.S. Air Force Never Built the Stealth Fighter?

F-117 Stealth Fighter from Skunk Works
February 20, 2024 Topic: Security Region: Americas Blog Brand: The Reboot Tags: MilitaryDefenseHistoryF-117F-117 NighthawkStealthAir Force

F-117 Nighthawk: What if the U.S. Air Force Never Built the Stealth Fighter?

The F-117 Nighthawk stealth fighter, revealed in 1988 and first demonstrated in 1990, emerged from U.S. Air Force initiatives during the Cold War to penetrate Soviet air defenses with precision strikes, addressing vulnerabilities identified during the Vietnam War.

 

Summary: The F-117 Nighthawk stealth fighter, revealed in 1988 and first demonstrated in 1990, emerged from U.S. Air Force initiatives during the Cold War to penetrate Soviet air defenses with precision strikes, addressing vulnerabilities identified during the Vietnam War. It was the first aircraft designed with stealth technology, incorporating advances in radar evasion and computer-assisted flight to maintain stability despite its unconventional shape. Despite early challenges, including unstable prototypes and political skepticism, the F-117 proved crucial in conflicts like Operation Just Cause and the Gulf War. Its success paved the way for subsequent stealth aircraft, such as the F-22 and B-21, fundamentally influencing U.S. military aerospace strategy. Its operational history, marked by a significant downing during the Kosovo War, underscores its importance and the transformative impact of stealth technology on modern military aviation.

F-117, Explained 

Rumors of the F-117 Nighthawk stealth fighter abounded, well before its first use in combat. After first seeing action in Operation Just Cause, the strike fighter delivered some of the first attacks of the war into the still-formidable teeth of Iraqi air defenses—well before the Iraqis could do anything about it. The F-117 went on to serve in several other conflicts, before retiring as other, more advanced stealth aircraft became available.

 

The F-117 pioneered the military concept of stealth. But what if it had never existed?

The Plane

The F-117 emerged from several unrelated strategic and technological developments. On the strategic side, the U.S. air forces had determined during the Vietnam War that even fairly cheap surface-to-air missile systems could make conventional airstrikes prohibitively expensive. Systems such as the SA-2 made it necessary the deployment of large-scale strike packages capable of blasting their way through defenses. Even then, U.S. strikes endured unacceptable losses, necessitating a different approach.

At the same time, aeronautical research determined that reducing radar-cross section (making interception more difficult) was conceivable, but that a “stealth” aircraft would have surfaces that made it extremely difficult to fly. Advances in computer-assisted flight, however, opened the possibility of resolving this problem. A related technological advance involved improved precision in bomb delivery, meaning that even with a relatively low payload the F-117 could cause significant damage to critical enemy targets.

Thus, in a super-secretive program, the U.S. Air Force developed the F-117 Nighthawk as a bomber (notwithstanding the F- designation) intended to strike with precision through Soviet air defenses against critical targets, disrupting the Red Army’s advance into Central Europe. The USAF did not reveal the existence of the plane until 1988, and first began to demonstrate it in 1990.

The Problems

The F-117 was a remarkable experiment, in that it did not resemble any aircraft that any nation had previously attempted to build. Extant concepts of stealth required a multifaceted aircraft that did not have the kind of surfaces normally associated with stable flight. Unsurprisingly, early testing of the F-117 revealed a very unstable aircraft; the two earliest prototypes were lost in accidents. Fortunately, engineers worked out the core problems before the accidents could kill the program.

Adding to this, Congress was only dimly aware of the existence of the stealth fighter project. In the 1970s and 1980s, in the wake of Vietnam, it was not at all unusual to find deep skepticism about military spending, and especially about the most secret parts of the national security state. While the F-117 benefitted from the Reagan-era defense buildup (although serious testing began in the Carter administration) a less congenial political environment might have made it difficult to justify continuing the program.

What if?

In practical terms, the US military would not have missed the F-117 all that much. The strikes it undertook, while important and consequential, could have been conducted by other aircraft with only a marginal increase in risk, or by Tomahawk cruise missiles. But if the death of the F-117 had led to the death of the stealth concept, it would have fundamentally transformed the nature of the U.S. military aerospace industry over the past forty years. Stealth has been an overwhelmingly important component to the major military aviation projects of the last forty years, including the F-22, the F-35, the B-2 and the B-21.

F-117

F-117 Was a Legend and an Odd Duck 

The Nighthawk remains an odd duck. Designated a fighter, it has no air-to-air combat capabilities. It paved a path for other stealth aircraft, but its children did not resemble it in the most important particulars. Its most famous moment came at the hands of the Serbian air defense network, when an enterprising group of officers laid a trap and managed to down one of the aircraft. Nevertheless, the F-117 was one of the most consequential aircraft for the future of military aviation, demonstrating the essential viability of stealth aircraft under conditions that the United States could reliably replicate. Its absence might well have left a large hole in U.S. aerospace strategy for the twenty-first century.

F-117

About the Author: Dr. Robert Farley 

Robert Farley, a frequent contributor to the National Interest, is the author of The Battleship Book. He serves as a senior lecturer at the Patterson School of Diplomacy and International Commerce at the University of Kentucky. His work includes military doctrine, national security, and maritime affairs. He blogs at Lawyers, Guns and Money and Information Dissemination and the Diplomat.