‘Life Behind the Berlin Wall’: An Antidote to the Myths of Socialism
The film will soon be shown in schools across America to illustrate that a market economy is superior to a planned economy.
When viewers of the documentary film Life Behind the Berlin Wall were informed that citizens of the German Democratic Republic (GDR) had to wait twelve to seventeen years for a Trabi (the worst car in the world), while West Germans could drive away in their new cars the same day, an audible laugh rippled through the audience. But that wasn’t the only surprising information that proved new to most viewers: In 1989, 65 percent of apartments in the GDR still had oven heating, 27 percent of GDR apartments didn’t have their own toilet, and only 16 percent of East Germans had a telephone, compared to 99 percent in West Germany.
These are just some of the facts revealed in the film, which premiered in Las Vegas on July 14 and won an award on July 16. Life Behind the Berlin Wall was shown as part of Freedom Fest and attended by 2,500 people and 350 speakers, including well-known libertarian Sen. Rand Paul, Forbes founder Steve Forbes, and legendary investor Jim Rogers.
The film will soon be shown in schools across America to illustrate that a market economy is superior to a planned economy. Thus, the film does not focus on political oppression, but on the economy and the everyday lives of East and West Germans.
Environmental Pollution in the GDR
An important theme of the film is environmental degradation in the GDR.
In 1989, the GDR emitted more than three times as much CO2 for each unit of GDP as the Federal Republic (West Germany). In the prior year, the GDR emitted ten times as much sulfur dioxide as the Federal Republic. Air pollution, too, was ten times higher in the GDR than in the Federal Republic, while almost half of the GDR’s major rivers were biologically dead in 1989 and 70 percent were no longer allowed to be used for drinking water. In fact, nearly half of the GDR’s residents received no clean drinking water part or all of the time due to the high input of nitrogen, phosphorus, heavy metals, and other pollutants into the waters.
Therefore, claims by anti-capitalists that private capitalist firms’ greed for profit is the cause of environmental degradation are misleading: environmental problems under socialism were much greater.
Why the Wall Was Built
Supporters of “democratic socialism” distance themselves from systems like those that prevailed in the GDR. But they act as if the economics and politics can be arbitrarily separated from one another. The focus of their criticism is the elimination of political and democratic freedoms in countries like the GDR or the USSR. But the economic recipes of many supporters of “democratic socialism” are quite similar to those of their non-democratic comrades, for they are characterized by a deep distrust of market forces and an almost limitless trust in the state.
Supporters of “democratic socialism” only want to correct the “mistake” made by real-world socialist states over the past 100 years and combine the socialist economic system with a democratic state constitution. For these advocates of “democratic socialism,” it is apparently a coincidence that societies with a non-capitalist base, characterized by the absence of economic freedom, also have a political system in which freedoms are absent.
An example of the connection between the elimination of economic freedoms and political freedoms was the GDR: first, economic freedom was eliminated through the nationalization of land and the means of production. As a result, there was a massive disparity between the economic performance of East Germany and West Germany. The standard of living in the West was much higher, so 2.8 million people fled the GDR—especially, but not only, entrepreneurs and well-educated professionals. The fact that the wall was built in 1961 was, therefore, an economic inevitability—otherwise, the system in East Germany would have been bled dry immediately.
Socialists like to compare the reality of capitalism with their own theories of an ideal society. But that’s as unfair as comparing your real-life marriage to a romance novel that showcases the perfect love affair. Socialism always looks good on paper—except when that paper is in a history book.
Rainer Zitelmann is a historian and sociologist. The film is based on a chapter in his book The Power of Capitalism.