The two ship classes would provide the Corps with “complementary capabilities,” Marine Corps Commandant Gen. David Berger explained at the National Defense Industry Association’s annual Expeditionary Warfare conference, according to USNI News.
The Corps’ legacy amphibious warships have “all the attributes that we know and love so much over the years that a Marine Expeditionary Unit and Amphibious Ready Group have been using,” Gen. Berger explained, adding that the new Light Amphibious Warship is no substitute for its older, larger counterpart.
Instead, the LAW provides “the tactical mobility to move a smaller element organically that fits this stand-in force approach” that the Marine Corps is pursuing.
The strategy is an enormous shift from the grinding land campaigns that characterized the Marine Corps’ involvement in the Middle East during the past two decades. Instead, the Marine Corps is retooling for a maritime fight and returning to its roots as a land extension of naval power.
Larger amphibious warships can fill many different roles, running “the whole gamut from the deterrence aspect and you can pick your deterrence by denial or deterrence by collection – whichever lens you want to use for deterrence – through crisis response all the way to humanitarian assistance, disaster relief, evacuating people … they do it all,” General Berger explained.
The Navy and Marine Corps’ amphibious warships are numerous and, confusingly, share similar acronyms. Thankfully this explainer parses out the differences between ship classes and provides an overview of the United States’ amphibious warships.
The Commandant added that the large ships are “a floating airfield, hospital, command and control platform and it’s all U.S. sovereign territory that you can move around.” And, their large well deck can hold multiple kinds of payloads, hidden away from prying eyes to keep an enemy guessing.
The Marine Corps’ new Light Amphibious Warship is a high priority alongside the Corps’ larger amphibious ships. But securing enough LAWs won’t be easy. Funding for the ships competes against the Navy’s other budget priorities, like the Columbia-class submarine program. And the Navy has signaled that the program, one of the Navy’s most expensive ever, is their number one priority.
Caleb Larson is a multimedia journalist and defense writer with the National Interest. A graduate of UCLA, he also holds a Master of Public Policy and lives in Berlin. He covers the intersection of conflict, security, and technology, focusing on American foreign policy, European security, and German society for both print and radio. Follow him on Twitter @calebmlarson.