Taiwan Challenges Its Neighbors

The territorial disputes between China and its Southeast Asian neighbors over islands in the South China Sea have received considerable attention from an anxious international community. There has been even more global angst about the flare up of tensions between China and Japan over the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands in the East China Sea. Concern about those feuds—especially the Sino-Japanese confrontation—is understandable, given the potential for miscalculation and escalation.

But it’s important to note that there is another, increasingly assertive party to both disputes: Taiwan. And the Taiwanese have not been shy about pressing their claims. That adds a volatile element to the controversies.

Taipei has not only asserted ownership of portions of the South China Sea; it has managed to establish a significant physical presence there. Taiwan controls the Pratas—the largest island group, known locally as the Donghsa Islands—and Taiping, the largest of the hotly contested Spratly Islands. In September 2012, a group of thirty prominent Taiwanese, including national legislators, landed on Taiping to inspect the security situation. The coast guard conducted a live-fire exercise for the delegation during that visit, much to the annoyance of countries with competing claims.

The Taiwanese government summarily rejected all complaints. “Taiping Island is part of the Republic of China’s territory,” stated Wang kuo-jan, an official with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, in response to Vietnam’s diplomatic protest. He added that “no one has the right to protest over Taiwan’s exercise of its sovereignty rights there.”

But incidents between Taipei and other claimants in the South China Sea have been mild compared to the tensions with Japan over the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands. Matters came to a head in late September 2012 when a comic-opera naval battle involving water cannons erupted between Japanese patrol ships and a flotilla of dozens of Taiwanese fishing boats and coast guard vessels.

It might be tempting to smirk at such an episode, but anti-Japanese ethnic animosity has flared on Taiwan. Indeed, there have been angry demonstrations in Taiwanese cities, punctuated by burning the Japanese flag, just as on the mainland. Thus far, there has been markedly more hostility directed against Tokyo’s claims than against Beijing’s. Indeed, PRC officials have sought to spin Taiwan’s conduct as proof that “all Chinese,” irrespective of political differences on other issues, consider the islands Chinese territory.

Some of the underlying reasons for Taiwan’s territorial claims in the South China and East China seas are not hard to discern. There are vast, valuable fishing waters in both arenas, and commercial fishing is a crucial industry in Taiwan. It also is increasingly likely that there are large reservoirs of oil and natural gas under those waters. In other words, substantial economic stakes are involved in the territorial disputes, and neither Taiwan nor any other claimant is about to abandon such potential riches.

But in Taiwan’s case, another factor also may be at play, especially with regard to the Diaoyu/Senkaku issue. Taipei has called for trilateral talks to resolve that controversy, thus challenging the global perception that it is a purely bilateral controversy between Tokyo and Beijing. Taiwanese officials are also pressing for multilateral negotiations regarding the various claims in the South China Sea. Taking a more proactive stance on the territorial disputes—which has clearly been the case over the past year—might be a clever ploy to gain de facto recognition as a sovereign actor from Beijing, Tokyo, and other governments. Even though none of those countries is willing to establish formal relations with Taipei, they may have to deal with Taiwan as a key party to what are becoming ever more dangerous disputes.

Being accorded such respect, however grudgingly, would have implications for Taiwan’s international position. The island’s diplomatic status hangs by a thread, with only about two dozen nations maintaining official ties to Taipei. And all of them are small nations that Taiwan has effectively bribed with financial inducements to refrain from switching diplomatic recognition to Beijing. That fading strategy cannot endure much longer—especially as China’s economic resources and influence continue to mount.

Injecting itself as a major player in volatile territorial disputes may be a last-ditch, substitute strategy for gaining international recognition and respect. In any case, Taiwan is now a wild card in what are already some tense, worrisome confrontations. Washington and other governments need to carefully monitor this latest troubling development.

Ted Galen Carpenter, a senior fellow at the Cato Institute and a contributing editor to The National Interest, is the author of nine books and more than 500 articles and studies on international issues.

More by

Comments

FYWang (March 1, 2013 - 2:35pm)

We do not agree with Ted Carpenter’s assertion that the Republic of China’s (Taiwan) lawful claim to the disputed islands is a “troubling development.” Taiwan has time and again called for dialogue and a peaceful solution, and we believe that, on the contrary, this makes Taiwan a stabilizing force in the region.

The latest effort in this regard is President Ma Ying-jeou’s East China Sea Peace Initiative, which calls on all parties to shelve disputes in favor of the joint exploration and exploitation of the natural resources in the waters around the islands. Unveiled on Aug. 5, 2012, the Peace Initiative first and foremost calls on Taiwan, Japan, and mainland China to develop an East China Sea code of conduct. This important step will develop standards of practice and behavior and will help prevent unwanted incidents born of miscommunication and miscalculation.

Even Japan understands the spirit and fundamental thinking of the East China Sea Peace Initiative, according to Japan Foreign Minister Koichiro Genba, who expressed as much on Oct. 5, 2012, when he sent a message to Taiwan stating his belief that it was in the interest of all parties involved to ensure peace and stability in the East China Sea. Taiwan and Japan have since taken good-faith steps to resume negotiations on fishing rights in the area.

It must also be said that our government will not align with mainland China as a camp against another party.

The reality is that Taiwan has looked to deescalate the dispute from the beginning. Whether it’s the East China Sea Peace Initiative or the passive, non-violent protection of its fishing boats around the islands, Taiwan has consistently proven to be anything but a troubling development.

Frank Yee Wang

Director, Press Division

Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in the United States

michaelturton (March 2, 2013 - 6:21am)

"Angry demonstrations in Taiwanese cities". Be serious, Ted. I live in Taiwan. There have been NO public demonstrations. A few far right pro-China weirdos might get some publicity for staging the burning of flags, but the vast, vast majority of Taiwanese don't care about this issue, despite the government's constant attempts to get them to care. As for being a destabilizing factor in an attempt to make itself relevant, in that you are dead on.  Let's not forget too that the government still legitimates itself in part by claiming to govern all of China, and that is one of the underlying dynamics as well. Michael

JanMan (March 3, 2013 - 2:12am)

I believe the few weirdos that you are referring to, are none other than yourself, some of the DPP hardcore extremists and not forgetting, the outcast Lee Teng Hui.     These bunch of traitors who called themselves Taiwanese or Taiwanese pretender, are actually anti-Taiwanese diablos who have no shame propagating their false parables that Dioyutais Islands belong to the Japanese.    Especially to a pretender like you, Michael, just for the wacky excuse that you had married a Taiwanese woman, doesn't imply that you are entitled to speak on behalf of Taiwan or Taiwanese as a whole.  

Follow The National Interest

May 19, 2013