Pressure Cooker: How the South China Sea Can Help America Prod Beijing

No indication has been made as to whether Washington, DC is trading the South China Sea for Beijing’s cooperation on Pyongyang.

President Trump wants China’s help to rein in North Korea and has been open to negotiating with Beijing to deal with Pyongyang. Negotiations began with obtaining a more beneficial trade deal with the United States. There are now reports that the Pentagon turned down a freedom-of-navigation operation request in the South China Sea to avoid “antagonizing China.” No indication has been made as to whether Washington, DC is trading the South China Sea for Beijing’s cooperation on Pyongyang, but it is certainly one of many policy options.

While China’s help will be critical in a denuclearized Korean Peninsula, would it be wise for the United States to give up a large bargaining chip, such as the South China Sea, in exchange for Chinese action on North Korea—especially when China will not act in a way that could destabilize Kim Jong-un’s regime? Other issues exist in the U.S.-China relationship, such as the difficulty of doing business in China, cybersecurity, and not to mention the potential Thucydides Trap. Furthermore, Washington would lose credibility in the eyes of its allies and potentially place its economic interests at risk. So, regarding a trade of the South China Sea and avoidance of a trade war for North Korea, Beijing looks like it would get a lot more in exchange for very little. These gains are worth considering:

China’s National Interests in the South China Sea

Beijing and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) have numerous interests in the South China Sea. Nearly all of them are linked to its primary interests: government legitimacy.

Nationalism is a pillar of the CCP’s legitimacy. Controlling, or at least increasing control over its claimed territory in the South China Sea, allows Beijing to play to nationalist sentiment and drum up support for the party. Furthermore, the Chinese government has consistently told its people that the disputed territory in the South China Sea has been Chinese territory for hundreds of years, giving China an even greater interest in recovering the disputed territory in the South China Sea for fear of losing face and, thus, legitimacy.

Beyond the nationalist pillar, another South China Sea legitimacy issue, one that is often overlooked or combined with nationalism, is Chinese territorial integrity. Mao Zedong and the CCP claimed their legitimacy came from defending and upholding China’s territory. In general, territory has been a crucial aspect of government legitimacy in China. The failure of the Qing Dynasty and the Republic of China (ROC) to defend themselves from imperialism played a role in their respective downfalls. Since the CCP does not want to see itself go the way of the Qing or the ROC, it feels the need to prevail in the South China Sea territorial disputes. Failure to do so could spark regime-threatening sentiment.

China also has extensive economic interests in the South China Sea that have implications for the Communist Party’s right to rule. The first is energy security. Already, 86 percent of China’s maritime oil imports and over 50 percent of its gas imports traverse the South China Sea. Beijing’s dependence on energy imports is set to increase to 25 percent by 2035, with domestic energy consumption expanding by around 50 percent. China’s economic growth depends, in part, on imported energy moving through the South China Sea. Securing the South China Sea helps Beijing protect its lifeline of energy. Additionally, the South China Sea may hold up to 125 billion barrels of oil and 500 trillion cubic feet of natural gas.

Thus, controlling the disputed territory in the South China Sea would allow China to tap into vast energy resources, reduce its dependence on foreign oil and gas, and keep the economy growing, thereby helping to maintain the legitimacy of the Communist Party.